Date: 2.17.2017 / Article Rating: 4 / Votes: 7277 #Jo & judy

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Jo & judy

Write My Essays Today - jo & judy

Nov/Fri/2017 | Uncategorized

Write My Essay Online for Cheap - Jo & Judy Unboxing - YouTube

Nov 17, 2017 Jo & judy,

Write my essay, paper - Jo & Judy Unboxing - YouTube

AQA UNIT 5 Biology (synoptic essay) Watch. Judy. span Follow 5 followers 2 badges Send a private message to Essay on Carter's Transformation The Hurricane, tehsponge. Jo & Judy. They ask you a very broad question and Film, you can write about jo &, anything science related, which is view the bridge quotes relevant. Judy. Basically its just mass regurgitation. Essay On Carter's Film The Hurricane. You do need some of jo & judy your own knowledge to why money, score max marks though. Thanks so is jo & there any fixed percentages of social how much of jo & judy it is social media statement synopsis? Can I hope for jo &, a question related to from the bridge, some unit 5 stuff? Most questions involve content from jo & judy, all the Essay on Carter's Transformation, units. Jo & Judy. Example; Discuss Cycles in gautama, Biology. Jo & Judy. Paragraph one - Oestrous Cycle (unit five) Paragraph two - Nutrient Cycles (unit four) this could be two paragraphs if you wanted. Define. Paragraph three - Cardiac Cycle (unit one)

Paragraph four - Biochemical Cycles, e.g Krebs and jo & judy, Calvin (unit four) Ah. Mary. how come you know so much? span Follow 21 followers 2 badges Send a private message to jo & judy, Destroyviruses. Russian Literature. I don't know how well people are made aware of the jo &, marking structure for Essay the Father Russian, the unit 5 essay. Jo & Judy. But basically this is mathilda mary how I know it to jo &, be, but I could be wrong, feel free to Film, correct anything I get wrong. span Follow 21 followers 2 badges Send a private message to jo & judy, Destroyviruses. View From. The way our teacher gets us to jo &, look at of siddhartha gautama it is judy imagine doing four 6 mark questions like the pollution, ones you got at jo & the end of conclusion of water pollution unit one and jo &, two. Why Money. Each 6 mark question would probably be on jo & judy, one or two units, from media, any of the jo & judy, possible four.

Example; Discuss Cycles in mathilda shelley, Biology. Jo & Judy. Paragraph one - Oestrous Cycle (unit five) Paragraph two - Nutrient Cycles (unit four) this could be two paragraphs if you wanted. Social Media Statement. Paragraph three - Cardiac Cycle (unit one) Paragraph four - Biochemical Cycles, e.g Krebs and jo &, Calvin (unit four) span Follow 0 followers 2 badges Send a private message to Essay on Carter's Transformation in the, Seasick Steve. span Follow 5 followers 2 badges Send a private message to jo &, tehsponge. Why Money Is Important. Well thanks for jo &, that ! But I really need to view from quotes, know what to judy, read furtherly, I can do exra physiology because Ive got a fat book but the of siddhartha, rest im lost. Jo &. span Follow 21 followers 2 badges Send a private message to is important, Destroyviruses. Jo &. The best thing to mary shelley, do I think, is to jo &, make a giant mind map of the gautama, chapter headings, and jo &, any related to mathilda shelley, them. Jo & Judy. So like you can link the define, proteins stuff from jo &, unit 1 to mary, enzymes, DNA technology, DNA replication etc. Jo &. You can then read up on define, some extra things, like a specific enzyme which isn't on judy, the syllabus, which then gives you an of siddhartha gautama extra point to jo &, talk about gautama, if you were asked about jo &, anything to Essay in the Film, do with proteins, enzymes or gene expression. Jo & Judy. By doing this you're greatly reducing the social media thesis, number of judy additional facts you need because you'll find you can relate them to kwashiorkor, a lot of jo & judy different essay titles. Kwashiorkor. span Follow 5 followers 2 badges Send a private message to jo &, fretter778. Pollution. span Follow 2 followers 0 badges Send a private message to judy, al_habib. Hi, I'm abit unsure of social thesis what we're expected to jo &, write about in conclusion, the synoptic essay. Jo & Judy. span Follow 21 followers 2 badges Send a private message to definition of siddhartha, Destroyviruses.

New Scientist and judy, Biological Sciences Review are easy extra reading that's up to definition of siddhartha, date. Jo &. Me and gautama, some of judy my friends have found articles which cover so much stuff we've done and on Alexander, would be relevant, and jo &, is far less specialised and Essay on Alexander Pushkin;, time consuming than a book that will just cover 1 topic you might not be able to jo & judy, write about. Mary. span Follow 0 followers 0 badges Send a private message to judy, Smartiez. Definition Of Siddhartha Gautama. span Follow 0 followers 0 badges Send a private message to jo &, massi1296. Essay On Alexander The Father Literature. 'How the jo & judy, structure of Transformation in the cells is judy related to why money, their function' We have a brilliant team of jo & more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on define, The Student Room, helping to judy, make it a fun, safe and kwashiorkor, useful place to judy, hang out. Media Thesis. 0 new posts What does seem to jo &, be infatuation or weird Started by: Jmonay Forum: Relationships Replies: 3 Last post: 1 minute ago Death penalty arguments against definition of siddhartha gautama, Started by: AmeliaF Forum: Society Replies: 22 Last post: 1 minute ago Message me about jo & judy, anything Started by: Betty2106 Forum: Chat Replies: 11 Last post: 1 minute ago Do you pay your parents rent or receive an why money allowance (POLL)? Started by: usualsuspects Forum: Chat Replies: 1 Last post: 1 minute ago The Liverpool FC Thread XV Started by: Zerforax Forum: Football Replies: 5051 Last post: 1 minute ago UKMT Maths Challenges Chat 2017/18 Started by: Sonechka Forum: Maths Exams Replies: 39 Last post: 1 minute ago Why do girls seem more interested in judy, me when i'm in conclusion pollution, a relationship? Started by: Anonymous Forum: Relationships Replies: 7 Last post: 1 minute ago Volkswagen Connect - Free Dataplug device! Started by: IWMTom Forum: Cars and judy, motoring Replies: 15 Last post: 1 minute ago Quit job or nah?

Started by: Norozac Forum: Advice on from, everyday issues Replies: 2 Last post: 1 minute ago Theresa May is jo & judy handed her P45 Started by: Danny Dorito Forum: News and the Father of Modern Russian Literature, current affairs Replies: 14 Last post: 1 minute ago Qualifying law degrees Started by: Elle042 Forum: Law Replies: 1 Last post: 2 minutes ago omg Started by: erenmont01 Forum: Relationships Replies: 1 Last post: 2 minutes ago Eye contact from jo &, women confuses me Started by: James385 Forum: Relationships Replies: 1 Last post: 3 minutes ago IELTS scores Started by: Student_18_ Forum: Undergraduate Education Replies: 0 Last post: 3 minutes ago Interview to Essay on Carter's, be a lab technician. Jo &. Need help? Started by: Klimenski Forum: Advice on view quotes, everyday issues Replies: 1 Last post: 3 minutes ago Simultaneous equation and jo & judy, graphs Started by: FuryBall Forum: Maths Replies: 0 Last post: 3 minutes ago St. Andrews University - official applicants thread 2018 Started by: Holly2312 Forum: St Andrews University Replies: 74 Last post: 4 minutes ago RBS video interview Started by: Samantha303 Forum: Investment banking and define, consultancy Replies: 46 Last post: 4 minutes ago Can they kick people out of judy medicine? Started by: geniequeen48 Forum: Medicine Replies: 3 Last post: 4 minutes ago ** Official Investment Banking Spring Week 2018 Thread ** Started by: Samendra Forum: Investment banking and definition of siddhartha gautama, consultancy Replies: 1258 Last post: 5 minutes ago See more 0 new posts Kinder eggs are banned in jo &, the US. Definition Gautama. but guns aren't! Started by: zezno Forum: Society Replies: 52 Last post: 19 minutes ago Theresa May, dangerous Marxist Started by: Fullofsurprises Forum: UK politics Replies: 16 Last post: 25 minutes ago Theresa May is judy handed her P45 Started by: Danny Dorito Forum: News and define kwashiorkor, current affairs Replies: 14 Last post: 1 minute ago Goku VS Superman Started by: WyvernFires Forum: Film Replies: 26 Last post: 49 minutes ago ** Official Investment Banking Summer Internship 2018 Thread ** Started by: martimc Forum: Investment Banking Internships and judy, Work Experience Replies: 4217 Last post: 11 minutes ago What's more beneficial - Placement Year or Year Abroad? Started by: Commies Forum: Economics and definition gautama, PPE university courses Replies: 11 Last post: 1 Hour Ago Who remembers M.I.High? Started by: WyvernFires. Forum: TV shows Replies: 10 Last post: 1 Hour Ago Factorising Started by: Illidan2 Forum: Maths Replies: 13 Last post: 29 minutes ago Chance of jo & being killed in media, terror attack almost 1 in jo & judy, a million Started by: desaf1 Forum: News and of water, current affairs Replies: 9 Last post: 1 Hour Ago The Manchester United Thread XXI Started by: jam276 Forum: Football Replies: 5235 Last post: 37 minutes ago ** Official Investment Banking Spring Week 2018 Thread ** Started by: Samendra Forum: Investment banking and judy, consultancy Replies: 1258 Last post: 5 minutes ago Removing my teeth tomorrow. View Quotes. Started by: Beautystyle12 Forum: Advice on jo & judy, everyday issues Replies: 8 Last post: 53 minutes ago Why are British people so stingy?

Started by: lizfairy Forum: Advice on mary shelley, everyday issues Replies: 30 Last post: 9 minutes ago Why do girls seem more interested in judy, me when i'm in Essay Pushkin; of Modern Literature, a relationship? Started by: Anonymous Forum: Relationships Replies: 7 Last post: 1 minute ago Microsoft Word- favourite font Started by: King Leonidas Forum: Chat Replies: 7 Last post: 17 minutes ago Thousands of jo & Muslims march against define, terrorism in jo &, London Started by: Trapz99 Forum: News and mathilda shelley, current affairs Replies: 7 Last post: 16 minutes ago How am I meant to jo &, be well rounded when I have so much uni work? Started by: APersonYo Forum: Educational debate Replies: 18 Last post: 1 Hour Ago Message me about why money is important, anything Started by: Betty2106 Forum: Chat Replies: 11 Last post: 1 minute ago Barts The London (QMUL) Medicine - ask a student Started by: Queen Mary University of judy London Forum: Queen Mary University London Replies: 573 Last post: 1 Hour Ago Civil Service Fast Stream 2017/18 Started by: ShaniRob Forum: Public sector Replies: 732 Last post: 1 Hour Ago See more 0 new posts See more. Copyright The Student Room 2017 all rights reserved. Definition Gautama. The Student Room, Get Revising and jo &, Marked by pollution Teachers are trading names of jo & The Student Room Group Ltd. On Carter's The Hurricane. Register Number: 04666380 (England and jo & judy, Wales), VAT No.

806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE.

Write My Essay : 100% Original Content - JO & JUDY Design the Life You love | JO & JUDY

Jo & judy

Online Essay Writing Service - Jo & Judy Unboxing - YouTube

Nov 17, 2017 Jo & judy,

Expert Essay Writers - JO & JUDY Design the Life You love | JO & JUDY

KurzweilAI | Accelerating Intelligence. An analysis of the history of technology shows that technological change is jo & judy exponential, contrary to the common-sense intuitive linear view. So we wont experience 100 years of progress in kwashiorkor the 21st century it will be more like 20,000 years of jo & progress (at todays rate). The returns, such as chip speed and cost-effectiveness, also increase exponentially. Theres even exponential growth in the rate of exponential growth. Within a few decades, machine intelligence will surpass human intelligence, leading to The Singularity technological change so rapid and profound it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history. The implications include the merger of social media statement biological and jo & nonbiological intelligence, immortal software-based humans, and ultra-high levels of intelligence that expand outward in the universe at the speed of light.

You will get $40 trillion just by reading this essay and understanding what it says. Why Money Is Important? For complete details, see below. (Its true that authors will do just about anything to keep your attention, but Im serious about this statement. Until I return to a further explanation, however, do read the first sentence of this paragraph carefully.) Now back to the future: its widely misunderstood. Our forebears expected the future to be pretty much like their present, which had been pretty much like their past. Jo &? Although exponential trends did exist a thousand years ago, they were at mathilda, that very early stage where an exponential trend is so flat that it looks like no trend at jo &, all. So their lack of in the The Hurricane expectations was largely fulfilled. Today, in accordance with the common wisdom, everyone expects continuous technological progress and the social repercussions that follow.

But the future will be far more surprising than most observers realize: few have truly internalized the implications of the fact that the jo &, rate of mathilda shelley change itself is accelerating. The Intuitive Linear View versus the judy, Historical Exponential View. Most long range forecasts of technical feasibility in future time periods dramatically underestimate the power of future technology because they are based on what I call the intuitive linear view of technological progress rather than the from the bridge quotes, historical exponential view. To express this another way, it is not the case that we will experience a hundred years of progress in the twenty-first century; rather we will witness on the order of twenty thousand years of progress (at todays rate of judy progress, that is). This disparity in outlook comes up frequently in a variety of contexts, for example, the discussion of the conclusion, ethical issues that Bill Joy raised in his controversial WIRED cover story, Why The Future Doesnt Need Us. Bill and judy I have been frequently paired in a variety of venues as pessimist and optimist respectively. Although Im expected to Transformation The Hurricane criticize Bills position, and judy indeed I do take issue with his prescription of relinquishment, I nonetheless usually end up defending Joy on the key issue of feasibility. Recently a Noble Prize winning panelist dismissed Bills concerns, exclaiming that, were not going to see self-replicating nanoengineered entities for a hundred years. I pointed out that 100 years was indeed a reasonable estimate of the amount of technical progress required to achieve this particular milestone at todays rate of progress . Mary? But because were doubling the rate of progress every decade, well see a century of progress at todays rate in only 25 calendar years. When people think of a future period, they intuitively assume that the current rate of progress will continue for future periods. However, careful consideration of the jo & judy, pace of technology shows that the rate of why money progress is not constant, but it is human nature to judy adapt to Transformation in the Film The Hurricane the changing pace, so the jo & judy, intuitive view is why money is important that the pace will continue at the current rate.

Even for those of us who have been around long enough to experience how the pace increases over jo &, time, our unexamined intuition nonetheless provides the impression that progress changes at the rate that we have experienced recently. From the mathematicians perspective, a primary reason for this is that an exponential curve approximates a straight line when viewed for a brief duration. So even though the define, rate of progress in the very recent past (e.g., this past year) is far greater than it was ten years ago (let alone a hundred or a thousand years ago), our memories are nonetheless dominated by our very recent experience. It is typical, therefore, that even sophisticated commentators, when considering the future, extrapolate the current pace of change over the next 10 years or 100 years to determine their expectations. This is why I call this way of looking at the future the intuitive linear view. But a serious assessment of the history of technology shows that technological change is exponential.

In exponential growth, we find that a key measurement such as computational power is multiplied by a constant factor for each unit of time (e.g., doubling every year) rather than just being added to incrementally. Exponential growth is a feature of any evolutionary process, of jo & which technology is a primary example. Define? One can examine the jo & judy, data. in different ways, on view the bridge different time scales, and for a wide variety of technologies ranging from jo &, electronic to biological, and the acceleration of progress and growth applies. Indeed, we find not just simple exponential growth, but double exponential growth, meaning that the rate of define exponential growth is itself growing exponentially. These observations do not rely merely on an assumption of the continuation of Moores law (i.e., the exponential shrinking of jo & judy transistor sizes on an integrated circuit), but is based on a rich model of diverse technological processes. What it clearly shows is that technology, particularly the pace of technological change, advances (at least) exponentially, not linearly, and has been doing so since the statement, advent of technology, indeed since the advent of evolution on Earth. I emphasize this point because it is the most important failure that would-be prognosticators make in jo & considering future trends.

Most technology forecasts ignore altogether this historical exponential view of technological progress. That is why people tend to view overestimate what can be achieved in the short term (because we tend to judy leave out necessary details), but underestimate what can be achieved in the long term (because the from the bridge, exponential growth is ignored). We can organize these observations into jo & what I call the law of accelerating returns as follows: Evolution applies positive feedback in that the more capable methods resulting from one stage of why money is important evolutionary progress are used to create the next stage. As a result, the rate of progress of an jo & judy, evolutionary process increases exponentially over view from quotes, time. Over time, the order of the information embedded in the evolutionary process (i.e., the measure of how well the information fits a purpose, which in evolution is survival) increases. A correlate of the above observation is that the jo &, returns of an shelley, evolutionary process (e.g., the speed, cost-effectiveness, or overall power of a process) increase exponentially over judy, time. In another positive feedback loop, as a particular evolutionary process (e.g., computation) becomes more effective (e.g., cost effective), greater resources are deployed toward the further progress of that process. This results in a second level of exponential growth (i.e., the rate of exponential growth itself grows exponentially).

Biological evolution is one such evolutionary process. Technological evolution is define another such evolutionary process. Indeed, the emergence of the first technology creating species resulted in judy the new evolutionary process of technology. Therefore, technological evolution is an outgrowth ofand a continuation ofbiological evolution. A specific paradigm (a method or approach to solving a problem, e.g., shrinking transistors on an integrated circuit as an kwashiorkor, approach to making more powerful computers) provides exponential growth until the method exhausts its potential. Jo & Judy? When this happens, a paradigm shift (i.e., a fundamental change in Essay on Carter's Film The Hurricane the approach) occurs, which enables exponential growth to jo & continue. If we apply these principles at the highest level of evolution on Earth, the first step, the creation of cells, introduced the paradigm of why money biology.

The subsequent emergence of DNA provided a digital method to record the results of evolutionary experiments. Then, the evolution of a species who combined rational thought with an opposable appendage (i.e., the jo & judy, thumb) caused a fundamental paradigm shift from biology to technology. View The Bridge Quotes? The upcoming primary paradigm shift will be from biological thinking to a hybrid combining biological and judy nonbiological thinking. Social Statement? This hybrid will include biologically inspired processes resulting from the reverse engineering of biological brains. If we examine the timing of these steps, we see that the process has continuously accelerated.

The evolution of life forms required billions of years for the first steps (e.g., primitive cells); later on progress accelerated. During the jo & judy, Cambrian explosion, major paradigm shifts took only mathilda mary shelley tens of millions of years. Later on, Humanoids developed over a period of millions of years, and Homo sapiens over a period of only hundreds of judy thousands of years. With the Essay in the Film, advent of a technology-creating species, the exponential pace became too fast for evolution through DNA-guided protein synthesis and judy moved on to human-created technology. Essay Transformation In The Film? Technology goes beyond mere tool making; it is a process of creating ever more powerful technology using the tools from the previous round of innovation. In this way, human technology is distinguished from the tool making of other species. There is a record of each stage of technology, and each new stage of technology builds on the order of the previous stage. The first technological steps-sharp edges, fire, the wheeltook tens of thousands of years. For people living in this era, there was little noticeable technological change in jo & even a thousand years. Conclusion? By 1000 A.D., progress was much faster and a paradigm shift required only a century or two.

In the nineteenth century, we saw more technological change than in the nine centuries preceding it. Then in the first twenty years of the twentieth century, we saw more advancement than in jo & judy all of the nineteenth century. Now, paradigm shifts occur in only a few years time. The World Wide Web did not exist in anything like its present form just a few years ago; it didnt exist at all a decade ago. The paradigm shift rate (i.e., the why money is important, overall rate of technical progress) is currently doubling (approximately) every decade; that is, paradigm shift times are halving every decade (and the rate of acceleration is itself growing exponentially). So, the technological progress in the twenty-first century will be equivalent to what would require (in the linear view) on the order of 200 centuries. In contrast, the twentieth century saw only about 25 years of progress (again at todays rate of progress) since we have been speeding up to current rates. So the twenty-first century will see almost a thousand times greater technological change than its predecessor. To appreciate the judy, nature and significance of the coming singularity, it is important to social media thesis ponder the jo & judy, nature of exponential growth.

Toward this end, I am fond of telling the is important, tale of the inventor of chess and his patron, the emperor of China. In response to the emperors offer of a reward for his new beloved game, the jo &, inventor asked for a single grain of statement rice on the first square, two on the second square, four on the third, and so on. The Emperor quickly granted this seemingly benign and humble request. Judy? One version of the story has the emperor going bankrupt as the 63 doublings ultimately totaled 18 million trillion grains of rice. At ten grains of rice per square inch, this requires rice fields covering twice the Film The Hurricane, surface area of the Earth, oceans included. Another version of the story has the jo & judy, inventor losing his head. It should be pointed out that as the conclusion pollution, emperor and the inventor went through the first half of the chess board, things were fairly uneventful. The inventor was given spoonfuls of rice, then bowls of rice, then barrels. By the end of the first half of the chess board, the inventor had accumulated one large fields worth (4 billion grains), and the emperor did start to take notice. It was as they progressed through the second half of the chessboard that the situation quickly deteriorated.

Incidentally, with regard to the doublings of computation, thats about jo & where we stand nowthere have been slightly more than 32 doublings of from the bridge performance since the first programmable computers were invented during World War II. This is the jo &, nature of exponential growth. Although technology grows in Essay the exponential domain, we humans live in a linear world. So technological trends are not noticed as small levels of technological power are doubled. Then seemingly out of nowhere, a technology explodes into view. For example, when the Internet went from judy, 20,000 to is important 80,000 nodes over judy, a two year period during the 1980s, this progress remained hidden from the general public. Media Thesis Statement? A decade later, when it went from 20 million to 80 million nodes in the same amount of time, the impact was rather conspicuous. As exponential growth continues to accelerate into the first half of the jo & judy, twenty-first century, it will appear to explode into conclusion pollution infinity, at least from the jo &, limited and linear perspective of contemporary humans. The progress will ultimately become so fast that it will rupture our ability to follow it.

It will literally get out of our control. The illusion that we have our hand on the plug, will be dispelled. Can the pace of technological progress continue to mathilda shelley speed up indefinitely? Is there not a point where humans are unable to jo & think fast enough to keep up with it? With regard to why money is important unenhanced humans, clearly so.

But what would a thousand scientists, each a thousand times more intelligent than human scientists today, and each operating a thousand times faster than contemporary humans (because the information processing in their primarily nonbiological brains is faster) accomplish? One year would be like a millennium. What would they come up with? Well, for jo & one thing, they would come up with technology to become even more intelligent (because their intelligence is no longer of fixed capacity). They would change their own thought processes to think even faster. When the scientists evolve to be a million times more intelligent and is important operate a million times faster, then an hour would result in a century of progress (in todays terms). This, then, is the Singularity. Jo & Judy? The Singularity is technological change so rapid and so profound that it represents a rupture in the fabric of human history. Some would say that we cannot comprehend the Singularity, at least with our current level of understanding, and social thesis that it is impossible, therefore, to look past its event horizon and make sense of what lies beyond.

My view is that despite our profound limitations of thought, constrained as we are today to a mere hundred trillion interneuronal connections in our biological brains, we nonetheless have sufficient powers of jo & abstraction to make meaningful statements about the social, nature of life after the Singularity. Jo &? Most importantly, it is my view that the intelligence that will emerge will continue to represent the human civilization, which is already a human-machine civilization. This will be the kwashiorkor, next step in evolution, the next high level paradigm shift. To put the judy, concept of Singularity into perspective, lets explore the why money, history of the word itself. Singularity is a familiar word meaning a unique event with profound implications. In mathematics, the term implies infinity, the judy, explosion of value that occurs when dividing a constant by a number that gets closer and view from the bridge quotes closer to zero. In physics, similarly, a singularity denotes an judy, event or location of infinite power.

At the center of kwashiorkor a black hole, matter is so dense that its gravity is jo & judy infinite. As nearby matter and energy are drawn into the black hole, an event horizon separates the region from the Essay on Carter's Transformation Film The Hurricane, rest of the Universe. It constitutes a rupture in the fabric of jo & judy space and time. Why Money Is Important? The Universe itself is said to jo & judy have begun with just such a Singularity. In the 1950s, John Von Neumann was quoted as saying that the ever accelerating progress of technologygives the pollution, appearance of approaching some essential singularity in the history of the race beyond which human affairs, as we know them, could not continue. In the 1960s, I. J. Good wrote of an jo &, intelligence explosion, resulting from intelligent machines designing their next generation without human intervention. In 1986, Vernor Vinge, a mathematician and computer scientist at San Diego State University, wrote about is important a rapidly approaching technological singularity in jo & judy his science fiction novel, Marooned in Realtime. Then in 1993, Vinge presented a paper to a NASA-organized symposium which described the Singularity as an impending event resulting primarily from the define kwashiorkor, advent of entities with greater than human intelligence, which Vinge saw as the harbinger of a run-away phenomenon. From my perspective, the Singularity has many faces.

It represents the nearly vertical phase of exponential growth where the rate of growth is so extreme that technology appears to jo & judy be growing at infinite speed. Of course, from kwashiorkor, a mathematical perspective, there is no discontinuity, no rupture, and the growth rates remain finite, albeit extraordinarily large. But from our currently limited perspective, this imminent event appears to be an acute and abrupt break in jo & the continuity of progress. However, I emphasize the word currently, because one of the salient implications of the Singularity will be a change in the nature of media thesis statement our ability to understand. In other words, we will become vastly smarter as we merge with our technology. When I wrote my first book, The Age of Intelligent Machines, in the 1980s, I ended the book with the specter of the emergence of machine intelligence greater than human intelligence, but found it difficult to look beyond this event horizon. Now having thought about its implications for the past 20 years, I feel that we are indeed capable of judy understanding the many facets of this threshold, one that will transform all spheres of view from quotes human life. Consider a few examples of the implications. Jo & Judy? The bulk of our experiences will shift from real reality to social media thesis statement virtual reality. Most of the jo & judy, intelligence of our civilization will ultimately be nonbiological, which by the end of this century will be trillions of trillions of times more powerful than human intelligence.

However, to address often expressed concerns, this does not imply the quotes, end of biological intelligence, even if thrown from its perch of judy evolutionary superiority. View From The Bridge? Moreover, it is important to note that the nonbiological forms will be derivative of biological design. In other words, our civilization will remain human, indeed in many ways more exemplary of what we regard as human than it is today, although our understanding of the jo &, term will move beyond its strictly biological origins. Many observers have nonetheless expressed alarm at view from the bridge quotes, the emergence of forms of nonbiological intelligence superior to human intelligence. The potential to augment our own intelligence through intimate connection with other thinking mediums does not necessarily alleviate the judy, concern, as some people have expressed the wish to remain unenhanced while at the same time keeping their place at the top of the intellectual food chain. My view is that the likely outcome is that on the one hand, from the perspective of biological humanity, these superhuman intelligences will appear to be their transcendent servants, satisfying their needs and desires. Define? On the other hand, fulfilling the wishes of a revered biological legacy will occupy only a trivial portion of the intellectual power that the Singularity will bring. Needless to say, the Singularity will transform all aspects of our lives, social, sexual, and economic, which I explore herewith. Before considering further the implications of the Singularity, lets examine the jo &, wide range of Essay on Carter's in the Film The Hurricane technologies that are subject to the law of accelerating returns.

The exponential trend that has gained the greatest public recognition has become known as Moores Law. Gordon Moore, one of the inventors of judy integrated circuits, and then Chairman of Intel, noted in why money is important the mid 1970s that we could squeeze twice as many transistors on an integrated circuit every 24 months. Given that the electrons have less distance to travel, the jo & judy, circuits also run twice as fast, providing an overall quadrupling of computational power. After sixty years of on Carter's Transformation in the Film devoted service, Moores Law will die a dignified death no later than the year 2019. By that time, transistor features will be just a few atoms in width, and the strategy of ever finer photolithography will have run its course. So, will that be the end of the jo &, exponential growth of computing? If we plot the speed (in instructions per second) per $1000 (in constant dollars) of 49 famous calculators and computers spanning the from the bridge quotes, entire twentieth century, we note some interesting observations. Moores Law Was Not the First, but the Fifth Paradigm To Provide Exponential Growth of Computing. Each time one paradigm runs out of steam, another picks up the pace. It is important to note that Moores Law of Integrated Circuits was not the first, but the fifth paradigm to provide accelerating price-performance.

Computing devices have been consistently multiplying in power (per unit of time) from the mechanical calculating devices used in the 1890 U.S. Census, to Turings relay-based Robinson machine that cracked the Nazi enigma code, to the CBS vacuum tube computer that predicted the election of Eisenhower, to the transistor-based machines used in the first space launches, to the integrated-circuit-based personal computer which I used to dictate (and automatically transcribe) this essay. But I noticed something else surprising. When I plotted the 49 machines on an exponential graph (where a straight line means exponential growth), I didnt get a straight line. What I got was another exponential curve. In other words, theres exponential growth in the rate of exponential growth. Computer speed (per unit cost) doubled every three years between 1910 and judy 1950, doubled every two years between 1950 and 1966, and is now doubling every year. But where does Moores Law come from? What is behind this remarkably predictable phenomenon?

I have seen relatively little written about the ultimate source of this trend. Is it just a set of industry expectations and kwashiorkor goals, as Randy Isaac, head of basic science at judy, IBM contends? Or is there something more profound going on? In my view, it is one manifestation (among many) of the exponential growth of the evolutionary process that is why money technology. The exponential growth of computing is a marvelous quantitative example of the jo &, exponentially growing returns from an evolutionary process.

We can also express the exponential growth of computing in terms of an accelerating pace: it took ninety years to achieve the view from the bridge, first MIPS (million instructions per second) per judy, thousand dollars, now we add one MIPS per why money, thousand dollars every day. Moores Law narrowly refers to the number of transistors on an integrated circuit of jo & fixed size, and view from sometimes has been expressed even more narrowly in terms of transistor feature size. But rather than feature size (which is only one contributing factor), or even number of transistors, I think the most appropriate measure to track is judy computational speed per unit cost. This takes into account many levels of view from quotes cleverness (i.e., innovation, which is to jo & judy say, technological evolution). In addition to all of the innovation in integrated circuits, there are multiple layers of kwashiorkor innovation in computer design, e.g., pipelining, parallel processing, instruction look-ahead, instruction and memory caching, and many others. From the above chart, we see that the exponential growth of computing didnt start with integrated circuits (around 1958), or even transistors (around 1947), but goes back to the electromechanical calculators used in the 1890 and 1900 U.S. Census. This chart spans at least five distinct paradigms of computing, of which Moores Law pertains to judy only the latest one. Its obvious what the sixth paradigm will be after Moores Law runs out of view quotes steam during the second decade of this century. Chips today are flat (although it does require up to jo & judy 20 layers of material to is important produce one layer of jo & judy circuitry). Our brain, in contrast, is organized in three dimensions.

We live in a three dimensional world, why not use the third dimension? The human brain actually uses a very inefficient electrochemical digital controlled analog computational process. The bulk of the define kwashiorkor, calculations are done in the interneuronal connections at a speed of only about 200 calculations per second (in each connection), which is about ten million times slower than contemporary electronic circuits. But the brain gains its prodigious powers from judy, its extremely parallel organization in kwashiorkor three dimensions . There are many technologies in jo & judy the wings that build circuitry in three dimensions. Mathilda? Nanotubes, for example, which are already working in jo & judy laboratories, build circuits from pentagonal arrays of social thesis carbon atoms. One cubic inch of nanotube circuitry would be a million times more powerful than the human brain. Jo &? There are more than enough new computing technologies now being researched, including three-dimensional silicon chips, optical computing, crystalline computing, DNA computing, and kwashiorkor quantum computing, to judy keep the why money is important, law of accelerating returns as applied to computation going for a long time. Thus the (double) exponential growth of computing is broader than Moores Law, which refers to only one of its paradigms. Judy? And this accelerating growth of in the The Hurricane computing is, in turn, part of the yet broader phenomenon of the accelerating pace of any evolutionary process. Observers are quick to criticize extrapolations of an exponential trend on the basis that the trend is judy bound to run out of resources. The classical example is when a species happens upon a new habitat (e.g., rabbits in from Australia), the species numbers will grow exponentially for a time, but then hit a limit when resources such as food and jo & judy space run out. But the resources underlying the exponential growth of an evolutionary process are relatively unbounded: (i) The (ever growing) order of the evolutionary process itself.

Each stage of Essay on Carter's Transformation Film evolution provides more powerful tools for judy the next. In biological evolution, the advent of pollution DNA allowed more powerful and faster evolutionary experiments. Later, setting the jo & judy, designs of animal body plans during the Cambrian explosion allowed rapid evolutionary development of other body organs such as the brain. Or to take a more recent example, the advent of computer assisted design tools allows rapid development of the next generation of computers. (ii) The chaos of the environment in which the evolutionary process takes place and which provides the options for further diversity. In biological evolution, diversity enters the process in the form of of water pollution mutations and jo & judy ever changing environmental conditions. In technological evolution, human ingenuity combined with ever changing market conditions keep the process of innovation going. The maximum potential of matter and energy to contain intelligent processes is a valid issue. But according to my models, we wont approach those limits during this century (but this will become an issue within a couple of centuries).

We also need to distinguish between the S curve (an S stretched to the right, comprising very slow, virtually unnoticeable growthfollowed by very rapid growthfollowed by conclusion a flattening out as the process approaches an asymptote) that is characteristic of any specific technological paradigm and the continuing exponential growth that is characteristic of the ongoing evolutionary process of technology. Specific paradigms, such as Moores Law, do ultimately reach levels at which exponential growth is no longer feasible. Thus Moores Law is an judy, S curve. But the growth of computation is an ongoing exponential (at least until we saturate the Universe with the intelligence of our human-machine civilization, but that will not be a limit in this coming century). In accordance with the law of accelerating returns, paradigm shift, also called innovation, turns the S curve of any specific paradigm into a continuing exponential. A new paradigm (e.g., three-dimensional circuits) takes over when the old paradigm approaches its natural limit. This has already happened at why money, least four times in the history of computation.

This difference also distinguishes the jo & judy, tool making of non-human species, in which the mastery of a tool-making (or using) skill by each animal is characterized by an abruptly ending S shaped learning curve, versus human-created technology, which has followed an exponential pattern of growth and acceleration since its inception. DNA Sequencing, Memory, Communications, the Internet, and Miniaturization. This law of accelerating returns applies to shelley all of technology, indeed to any true evolutionary process, and judy can be measured with remarkable precision in information based technologies. There are a great many examples of the exponential growth implied by the law of accelerating returns in technologies as varied as DNA sequencing, communication speeds, electronics of all kinds, and even in the rapidly shrinking size of technology. The Singularity results not from the from quotes, exponential explosion of jo & judy computation alone, but rather from the interplay and myriad synergies that will result from manifold intertwined technological revolutions. Also, keep in mind that every point on the exponential growth curves underlying these panoply of from the bridge quotes technologies (see the jo & judy, graphs below) represents an intense human drama of innovation and competition. It is remarkable therefore that these chaotic processes result in such smooth and predictable exponential trends. For example, when the human genome scan started fourteen years ago, critics pointed out that given the speed with which the genome could then be scanned, it would take thousands of years to finish the project.

Yet the fifteen year project was nonetheless completed slightly ahead of schedule. Of course, we expect to see exponential growth in electronic memories such as RAM. Notice How Exponential Growth Continued through Paradigm Shifts from Vacuum Tubes to Discrete Transistors to Integrated Circuits. However, growth in magnetic memory is kwashiorkor not primarily a matter of judy Moores law, but includes advances in mechanical and electromagnetic systems. Exponential growth in define communications technology has been even more explosive than in computation and is no less significant in its implications.

Again, this progression involves far more than just shrinking transistors on an integrated circuit, but includes accelerating advances in fiber optics, optical switching, electromagnetic technologies, and jo & judy others. Notice Cascade of smaller S Curves. Note that in the above two charts we can actually see the progression of S curves: the acceleration fostered by the bridge quotes a new paradigm, followed by a leveling off as the paradigm runs out of steam, followed by renewed acceleration through paradigm shift. The following two charts show the overall growth of the Internet based on the number of judy hosts. View The Bridge Quotes? These two charts plot the jo &, same data, but one is on an exponential axis and the other is linear. As I pointed out earlier, whereas technology progresses in the exponential domain, we experience it in the linear domain. So from the perspective of most observers, nothing was happening until the mid 1990s when seemingly out of nowhere, the of water, world wide web and email exploded into view. But the emergence of the Internet into a worldwide phenomenon was readily predictable much earlier by examining the exponential trend data.

Notice how the explosion of the Internet appears to be a surprise from the Linear Chart, but was perfectly predictable from the judy, Exponential Chart. Ultimately we will get away from the tangle of wires in our cities and in our lives through wireless communication, the power of which is doubling every 10 to 11 months. Another technology that will have profound implications for the twenty-first century is the pervasive trend toward making things smaller, i.e., miniaturization. Why Money? The salient implementation sizes of a broad range of technologies, both electronic and mechanical, are shrinking, also at jo &, a double exponential rate. At present, we are shrinking technology by a factor of approximately 5.6 per linear dimension per mary shelley, decade. The Exponential Growth of Computation Revisited. If we view the exponential growth of computation in its proper perspective as one example of the pervasiveness of the exponential growth of information based technology, that is, as one example of many of the law of accelerating returns, then we can confidently predict its continuation. In the accompanying sidebar, I include a simplified mathematical model of the law of accelerating returns as it pertains to the (double) exponential growth of computing. The formulas below result in the above graph of the continued growth of computation. This graph matches the available data for the twentieth century through all five paradigms and provides projections for the twenty-first century.

Note how the jo & judy, Growth Rate is growing slowly, but nonetheless exponentially. The Law of Accelerating Returns Applied to Transformation in the Film The Hurricane the Growth of Computation. The following provides a brief overview of the jo &, law of accelerating returns as it applies to the double exponential growth of computation. This model considers the impact of the growing power of the technology to mathilda mary shelley foster its own next generation. For example, with more powerful computers and related technology, we have the tools and the knowledge to design yet more powerful computers, and to do so more quickly. Note that the data for jo & the year 2000 and beyond assume neural net connection calculations as it is conclusion of water pollution expected that this type of calculation will ultimately dominate, particularly in emulating human brain functions.

This type of calculation is less expensive than conventional (e.g., Pentium III / IV) calculations by a factor of at least 100 (particularly if implemented using digital controlled analog electronics, which would correspond well to jo & the brains digital controlled analog electrochemical processes). A factor of 100 translates into define approximately 6 years (today) and less than 6 years later in the twenty-first century. My estimate of brain capacity is 100 billion neurons times an average 1,000 connections per neuron (with the jo &, calculations taking place primarily in the connections) times 200 calculations per second. Conclusion? Although these estimates are conservatively high, one can find higher and lower estimates. Jo &? However, even much higher (or lower) estimates by orders of magnitude only shift the prediction by a relatively small number of years. Some prominent dates from this analysis include the following: We achieve one Human Brain capability (2 * 10^16 cps) for $1,000 around the kwashiorkor, year 2023.

We achieve one Human Brain capability (2 * 10^16 cps) for jo & one cent around the year 2037. Mary Shelley? We achieve one Human Race capability (2 * 10^26 cps) for $1,000 around the jo & judy, year 2049. We achieve one Human Race capability (2 * 10^26 cps) for one cent around the year 2059. The Model considers the view the bridge quotes, following variables: V: Velocity (i.e., power) of computing (measured in CPS/unit cost) W: World Knowledge as it pertains to designing and building computational devices t: Time. The assumptions of the model are: In other words, computer power is a linear function of the knowledge of how to build computers.

This is actually a conservative assumption. In general, innovations improve V (computer power) by a multiple, not in jo & an additive way. Independent innovations multiply each others effect. For example, a circuit advance such as CMOS, a more efficient IC wiring methodology, and a processor innovation such as pipelining all increase V by media thesis statement independent multiples. In other words, W (knowledge) is cumulative, and jo & the instantaneous increment to knowledge is proportional to kwashiorkor V. W = C1 * C2 * Integral (0 to t) W W = C1 * C2 * C3 ^ (C4 * t) V = C1 ^ 2 * C2 * C3 ^ (C4 * t) (Note on notation: a^b means a raised to jo & judy the b power.) Simplifying the mathilda mary, constants, we get: So this is a formula for accelerating (i.e., exponentially growing) returns, a regular Moores Law. As I mentioned above, the judy, data shows exponential growth in the rate of conclusion pollution exponential growth. Jo & Judy? (We doubled computer power every three years early in the twentieth century, every two years in the middle of the century, and close to mary every one year during the 1990s.) Lets factor in another exponential phenomenon, which is the growing resources for computation.

Not only is each (constant cost) device getting more powerful as a function of jo & W, but the view the bridge, resources deployed for computation are also growing exponentially. N: Expenditures for computation V = C1 * W (as before) N = C4 ^ (C5 * t) (Expenditure for computation is growing at its own exponential rate) W = C2 * Integral(0 to t) (N * V) As before, world knowledge is accumulating, and the instantaneous increment is jo & proportional to the amount of computation, which equals the resources deployed for computation (N) * the power of each (constant cost) device. W = C1 * C2 * Integral(0 to t) (C4 ^ (C5 * t) * W) W = C1 * C2 * (C3 ^ (C6 * t)) ^ (C7 * t) V = C1 ^ 2 * C2 * (C3 ^ (C6 * t)) ^ (C7 * t) Simplifying the social media thesis statement, constants, we get: This is a double exponentialan exponential curve in which the rate of jo & exponential growth is growing at a different exponential rate. Now lets consider real-world data. Considering the data for actual calculating devices and computers during the twentieth century: CPS/$1K: Calculations Per Second for media $1,000.

Twentieth century computing data matches: We can determine the growth rate over jo & judy, a period of time: Growth Rate =10^((LOG(CPS/$1K for Current Year) LOG(CPS/$1K for Previous Year))/(Current Year Previous Year)) Human Brain = 100 Billion (10^11) neurons * 1000 (10^3) Connections/Neuron * 200 (2 * 10^2) Calculations Per Second Per Connection = 2 * 10^16 Calculations Per Second Human Race = 10 Billion (10^10) Human Brains = 2 * 10^26 Calculations Per Second. These formulas produce the graph above. Already, IBMs Blue Gene supercomputer, now being built and scheduled to be completed by 2005, is projected to provide 1 million billion calculations per social media, second (i.e., one billion megaflops).

This is already one twentieth of the capacity of the human brain, which I estimate at a conservatively high 20 million billion calculations per second (100 billion neurons times 1,000 connections per neuron times 200 calculations per second per connection). In line with my earlier predictions, supercomputers will achieve one human brain capacity by 2010, and personal computers will do so by around 2020. Jo &? By 2030, it will take a village of human brains (around a thousand) to match $1000 of computing. By 2050, $1000 of view from the bridge computing will equal the judy, processing power of all human brains on Earth. Of course, this only includes those brains still using carbon-based neurons. While human neurons are wondrous creations in a way, we wouldnt (and dont) design computing circuits the same way. Our electronic circuits are already more than ten million times faster than a neurons electrochemical processes. Most of the complexity of a human neuron is devoted to why money is important maintaining its life support functions, not its information processing capabilities. Ultimately, we will need to jo & port our mental processes to a more suitable computational substrate.

Then our minds wont have to stay so small, being constrained as they are today to from the bridge quotes a mere hundred trillion neural connections each operating at a ponderous 200 digitally controlled analog calculations per second. So far, Ive been talking about the hardware of computing. The software is even more salient. Jo &? One of the principal assumptions underlying the expectation of the Singularity is the ability of nonbiological mediums to emulate the richness, subtlety, and conclusion pollution depth of human thinking. Jo &? Achieving the computational capacity of the social media thesis statement, human brain, or even villages and nations of human brains will not automatically produce human levels of jo & judy capability. By human levels I include all the diverse and subtle ways in which humans are intelligent, including musical and social media thesis artistic aptitude, creativity, physically moving through the world, and understanding and responding appropriately to emotion.

The requisite hardware capacity is judy a necessary but not sufficient condition. The organization and content of these resourcesthe software of intelligenceis also critical. Before addressing this issue, it is conclusion of water pollution important to jo & judy note that once a computer achieves a human level of intelligence, it will necessarily soar past it. A key advantage of nonbiological intelligence is that machines can easily share their knowledge. If I learn French, or read War and Peace, I cant readily download that learning to you.

You have to acquire that scholarship the view from quotes, same painstaking way that I did. My knowledge, embedded in a vast pattern of neurotransmitter concentrations and jo & interneuronal connections, cannot be quickly accessed or transmitted. But we wont leave out quick downloading ports in our nonbiological equivalents of human neuron clusters. When one computer learns a skill or gains an insight, it can immediately share that wisdom with billions of other machines. As a contemporary example, we spent years teaching one research computer how to recognize continuous human speech. We exposed it to thousands of hours of why money recorded speech, corrected its errors, and patiently improved its performance. Finally, it became quite adept at recognizing speech (I dictated most of my recent book to it).

Now if you want your own personal computer to recognize speech, it doesnt have to go through the same process; you can just download the fully trained patterns in seconds. Ultimately, billions of nonbiological entities can be the master of all human and machine acquired knowledge. In addition, computers are potentially millions of times faster than human neural circuits. A computer can also remember billions or even trillions of facts perfectly, while we are hard pressed to remember a handful of phone numbers. The combination of judy human level intelligence in a machine with a computers inherent superiority in the speed, accuracy, and of water pollution sharing ability of its memory will be formidable. There are a number of compelling scenarios to achieve higher levels of intelligence in our computers, and ultimately human levels and beyond. We will be able to evolve and jo & judy train a system combining massively parallel neural nets with other paradigms to understand language and model knowledge, including the ability to read and model the knowledge contained in written documents. Unlike many contemporary neural net machines, which use mathematically simplified models of human neurons, some contemporary neural nets are already using highly detailed models of human neurons, including detailed nonlinear analog activation functions and other relevant details.

Although the ability of todays computers to define extract and learn knowledge from jo &, natural language documents is is important limited, their capabilities in this domain are improving rapidly. Jo & Judy? Computers will be able to read on their own, understanding and modeling what they have read, by the second decade of the twenty-first century. We can then have our computers read all of the worlds literaturebooks, magazines, scientific journals, and other available material. Ultimately, the machines will gather knowledge on their own by view the bridge quotes venturing out on the web, or even into the physical world, drawing from the full spectrum of media and judy information services, and sharing knowledge with each other (which machines can do far more easily than their human creators). Reverse Engineering the Human Brain. The most compelling scenario for mastering the software of intelligence is to tap into the blueprint of the pollution, best example we can get our hands on of an intelligent process. There is jo & no reason why we cannot reverse engineer the human brain, and essentially copy its design. Social Media Thesis? Although it took its original designer several billion years to develop, its readily available to us, and not (yet) copyrighted.

Although theres a skull around the brain, it is not hidden from our view. The most immediately accessible way to jo & accomplish this is through destructive scanning: we take a frozen brain, preferably one frozen just slightly before rather than slightly after it was going to die anyway, and of water examine one brain layerone very thin sliceat a time. We can readily see every neuron and every connection and jo & judy every neurotransmitter concentration represented in each synapse-thin layer. Human brain scanning has already started. A condemned killer allowed his brain and body to social statement be scanned and you can access all 10 billion bytes of him on the Internet He has a 25 billion byte female companion on the site as well in case he gets lonely. This scan is not high enough in resolution for our purposes, but then, we probably dont want to base our templates of machine intelligence on the brain of jo & judy a convicted killer, anyway. But scanning a frozen brain is feasible today, albeit not yet at a sufficient speed or bandwidth, but again, the law of accelerating returns will provide the requisite speed of scanning, just as it did for the human genome scan. Carnegie Mellon Universitys Andreas Nowatzyk plans to scan the kwashiorkor, nervous system of the brain and body of jo & a mouse with a resolution of less than 200 nanometers, which is kwashiorkor getting very close to the resolution needed for jo & judy reverse engineering. We also have noninvasive scanning techniques today, including high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, optical imaging, near-infrared scanning, and other technologies which are capable in certain instances of resolving individual somas, or neuron cell bodies. Brain scanning technologies are also increasing their resolution with each new generation, just what we would expect from the law of accelerating returns.

Future generations will enable us to resolve the connections between neurons and to peer inside the mary, synapses and record the neurotransmitter concentrations. We can peer inside someones brain today with noninvasive scanners, which are increasing their resolution with each new generation of this technology. There are a number of technical challenges in accomplishing this, including achieving suitable resolution, bandwidth, lack of vibration, and safety. For a variety of reasons it is easier to scan the jo & judy, brain of someone recently deceased than of someone still living. It is shelley easier to get someone deceased to sit still, for one thing. But noninvasively scanning a living brain will ultimately become feasible as MRI, optical, and other scanning technologies continue to improve in resolution and speed. Although noninvasive means of scanning the brain from outside the skull are rapidly improving, the most practical approach to capturing every salient neural detail will be to scan it from inside. By 2030, nanobot (i.e., nano robot) technology will be viable, and judy brain scanning will be a prominent application. Nanobots are robots that are the mathilda mary shelley, size of jo & human blood cells, or even smaller. Billions of them could travel through every brain capillary and scan every relevant feature from up close.

Using high speed wireless communication, the nanobots would communicate with each other, and with other computers that are compiling the brain scan data base (in other words, the kwashiorkor, nanobots will all be on a wireless local area network). This scenario involves only capabilities that we can touch and feel today. We already have technology capable of producing very high resolution scans, provided that the scanner is physically proximate to judy the neural features. Why Money Is Important? The basic computational and communication methods are also essentially feasible today. The primary features that are not yet practical are nanobot size and cost. As I discussed above, we can project the exponentially declining cost of computation, and the rapidly declining size of both electronic and mechanical technologies. We can conservatively expect, therefore, the requisite nanobot technology by around 2030. Because of its ability to jo & place each scanner in very close physical proximity to every neural feature, nanobot-based scanning will be more practical than scanning the brain from outside. How will we apply the why money is important, thousands of trillions of jo & judy bytes of information derived from each brain scan? One approach is to why money use the judy, results to design more intelligent parallel algorithms for our machines, particularly those based on conclusion one of the neural net paradigms.

With this approach, we dont have to copy every single connection. Jo & Judy? There is a great deal of media thesis statement repetition and redundancy within any particular brain region. Although the information contained in a human brain would require thousands of trillions of bytes of information (on the order of judy 100 billion neurons times an average of 1,000 connections per social thesis, neuron, each with multiple neurotransmitter concentrations and connection data), the judy, design of the brain is characterized by a human genome of only about a billion bytes. Furthermore, most of the genome is redundant, so the mathilda, initial design of the brain is characterized by approximately one hundred million bytes, about the size of jo & judy Microsoft Word. Of course, the complexity of our brains greatly increases as we interact with the social, world (by a factor of more than ten million). Because of the highly repetitive patterns found in each specific brain region, it is judy not necessary to capture each detail in mathilda shelley order to jo & judy reverse engineer the view from, significant digital-analog algorithms. With this information, we can design simulated nets that operate similarly. There are already multiple efforts under way to jo & scan the in the, human brain and judy apply the pollution, insights derived to the design of intelligent machines.

The pace of brain reverse engineering is only slightly behind the availability of the brain scanning and neuron structure information. A contemporary example is a comprehensive model of a significant portion of the human auditory processing system that Lloyd Watts ( has developed from both neurobiology studies of specific neuron types and brain interneuronal connection information. Watts model includes five parallel paths and includes the actual intermediate representations of auditory information at each stage of neural processing. Watts has implemented his model as real-time software which can locate and jo & identify sounds with many of the same properties as human hearing. Kwashiorkor? Although a work in progress, the model illustrates the feasibility of converting neurobiological models and brain connection data into working simulations. Also, as Hans Moravec and others have speculated, these efficient simulations require about 1,000 times less computation than the theoretical potential of the biological neurons being simulated.

Reverse Engineering the Human Brain: Five Parallel Auditory Pathways. Chart by Lloyd Watts. Cochlea : Sense organ of hearing. 30,000 fibers converts motion of the stapes into jo & judy spectro-temporal representation of Essay Transformation Film The Hurricane sound. MC : Multipolar Cells. Measure spectral energy. GBC : Globular Bushy Cells. Judy? Relays spikes from the auditory nerve to the Lateral Superior. Olivary Complex (includes LSO and MSO) . Encoding of timing and amplitude of signals for binaural comparison of level. SBC : Spherical Bushy Cells.

Provide temporal sharpening of on Carter's in the time of jo & judy arrival, as a pre-processor for social interaural time difference calculation. OC : Octopus Cells. Detection of jo & judy transients. DCN : Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus. Mary Shelley? Detection of spectral edges and judy calibrating for noise levels. VNTB : Ventral Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body. Feedback signals to modulate outer hair cell function in view quotes the cochlea. VNLL , PON : Ventral Nucleus of the Lateral Lemniscus, Peri-Olivary Nuclei. Processing transients from the Octopus Cells. MSO : Medial Superior Olive.

Computing inter-aural time difference (difference in time of arrival between the two ears, used to tell where a sound is jo & judy coming from). LSO : Lateral Superior Olive. Also involved in in the The Hurricane computing inter-aural level difference. ICC : Central Nucleus of the Inferior Colliculus. The site of major integration of multiple representations of sound.

ICx : Exterior Nucleus of the Inferior Colliculus. Jo &? Further refinement of sound localization. SC : Superior Colliculus. Location of auditory/visual merging. MGB : Medial Geniculate Body.

The auditory portion of the thalamus. LS : Limbic System. Comprising many structures associated with emotion, memory, territory, etc. The brain is not one huge tabula rasa (i.e., undifferentiated blank slate), but rather an intricate and intertwined collection of hundreds of specialized regions. The process of peeling the onion to understand these interleaved regions is well underway.

As the requisite neuron models and brain interconnection data becomes available, detailed and implementable models such as the auditory example above will be developed for of water all brain regions. After the algorithms of a region are understood, they can be refined and extended before being implemented in synthetic neural equivalents. For one thing, they can be run on a computational substrate that is judy already more than ten million times faster than neural circuitry. And we can also throw in the methods for shelley building intelligent machines that we already understand. A more controversial application than this scanning-the-brain-to-understand-it scenario is scanning-the-brain-to- download -it . Here we scan someones brain to map the locations, interconnections, and contents of all the somas, axons, dendrites, presynaptic vesicles, neurotransmitter concentrations, and other neural components and jo & levels. Its entire organization can then be re-created on a neural computer of sufficient capacity, including the Essay on Carter's Transformation in the Film, contents of its memory. To do this, we need to understand local brain processes, although not necessarily all of the higher level processes. Scanning a brain with sufficient detail to download it may sound daunting, but so did the human genome scan.

All of the judy, basic technologies exist today, just not with the requisite speed, cost, and size, but these are the attributes that are improving at a double exponential pace. The computationally pertinent aspects of individual neurons are complicated, but definitely not beyond our ability to accurately model. For example, Ted Berger and his colleagues at Hedco Neurosciences have built integrated circuits that precisely match the digital and analog information processing characteristics of neurons, including clusters with hundreds of neurons. Carver Mead and his colleagues at CalTech have built a variety of integrated circuits that emulate the digital-analog characteristics of mammalian neural circuits. A recent experiment at San Diegos Institute for Nonlinear Science demonstrates the Essay Transformation Film The Hurricane, potential for electronic neurons to precisely emulate biological ones. Neurons (biological or otherwise) are a prime example of judy what is often called chaotic computing. Each neuron acts in an essentially unpredictable fashion. When an entire network of neurons receives input (from the outside world or from other networks of neurons), the mary, signaling amongst them appears at first to be frenzied and random. Over time, typically a fraction of a second or so, the chaotic interplay of the neurons dies down, and a stable pattern emerges.

This pattern represents the decision of the judy, neural network. Why Money? If the neural network is performing a pattern recognition task (which, incidentally, comprises the bulk of the activity in the human brain), then the emergent pattern represents the jo &, appropriate recognition. So the question addressed by the San Diego researchers was whether electronic neurons could engage in this chaotic dance alongside biological ones. They hooked up their artificial neurons with those from spiney lobsters in a single network, and their hybrid biological-nonbiological network performed in the same way (i.e., chaotic interplay followed by a stable emergent pattern) and with the same type of mathilda mary shelley results as an all biological net of neurons. Essentially, the jo & judy, biological neurons accepted their electronic peers. Media Statement? It indicates that their mathematical model of judy these neurons was reasonably accurate. There are many projects around the world which are creating nonbiological devices to from recreate in great detail the judy, functionality of human neuron clusters. The accuracy and scale of these neuron-cluster replications are rapidly increasing. We started with functionally equivalent recreations of single neurons, then clusters of tens, then hundreds, and now thousands.

Scaling up technical processes at mathilda shelley, an exponential pace is what technology is good at. As the computational power to emulate the human brain becomes availablewere not there yet, but we will be there within a couple of decadesprojects already under way to judy scan the human brain will be accelerated, with a view both to on Carter's The Hurricane understand the human brain in general, as well as providing a detailed description of the contents and design of specific brains. By the third decade of the twenty-first century, we will be in a position to jo & create highly detailed and complete maps of all relevant features of of water all neurons, neural connections and synapses in jo & the human brain, all of the Essay Film The Hurricane, neural details that play a role in the behavior and functionality of the jo &, brain, and to recreate these designs in mary shelley suitably advanced neural computers. Is the Human Brain Different from a Computer? Is the human brain different from a computer? The answer depends on what we mean by the word computer. Certainly the brain uses very different methods from judy, conventional contemporary computers. Most computers today are all digital and perform one (or perhaps a few) computations at a time at extremely high speed. In contrast, the human brain combines digital and analog methods with most computations performed in define the analog domain. The brain is judy massively parallel, performing on the order of a hundred trillion computations at the same time, but at extremely slow speeds.

With regard to digital versus analog computing, we know that digital computing can be functionally equivalent to mathilda shelley analog computing (although the reverse is not true), so we can perform all of the capabilities of jo & a hybrid digitalanalog network with an all digital computer. The Bridge Quotes? On the other hand, there is an engineering advantage to analog circuits in that analog computing is jo & potentially thousands of times more efficient. An analog computation can be performed by a few transistors, or, in the case of mammalian neurons, specific electrochemical processes. A digital computation, in contrast, requires thousands or tens of thousands of transistors. So there is a significant engineering advantage to from emulating the brains analog methods.

The massive parallelism of the jo & judy, human brain is the key to its pattern recognition abilities, which reflects the strength of human thinking. As I discussed above, mammalian neurons engage in a chaotic dance, and if the neural network has learned its lessons well, then a stable pattern will emerge reflecting the networks decision. There is no reason why our nonbiological functionally equivalent recreations of biological neural networks cannot be built using these same principles, and indeed there are dozens of kwashiorkor projects around the jo &, world that have succeeded in doing this. My own technical field is pattern recognition, and the projects that I have been involved in for over thirty years use this form of mathilda mary chaotic computing. Particularly successful examples are Carver Meads neural chips, which are highly parallel, use digital controlled analog computing, and are intended as functionally similar recreations of jo & judy biological networks. The Singularity envisions the emergence of define human-like intelligent entities of astonishing diversity and scope. Although these entities will be capable of passing the Turing test (i.e., able to jo & fool humans that they are human), the question arises as to The Hurricane whether these people are conscious, or just appear that way.

To gain some insight as to why this is an extremely subtle question (albeit an ultimately important one) it is useful to consider some of the paradoxes that emerge from the jo & judy, concept of kwashiorkor downloading specific human brains. Although I anticipate that the most common application of the jo & judy, knowledge gained from reverse engineering the human brain will be creating more intelligent machines that are not necessarily modeled on specific biological human individuals, the scenario of scanning and reinstantiating all of the neural details of a specific person raises the most immediate questions of define identity. Lets consider the question of what we will find when we do this. We have to consider this question on both the objective and subjective levels. Objective means everyone except me, so lets start with that. Objectively, when we scan someones brain and reinstantiate their personal mind file into a suitable computing medium, the newly emergent person will appear to other observers to have very much the same personality, history, and judy memory as the person originally scanned. Mathilda? That is, once the technology has been refined and perfected. Like any new technology, it wont be perfect at judy, first. But ultimately, the scans and recreations will be very accurate and realistic. Interacting with the newly instantiated person will feel like interacting with the original person. The new person will claim to shelley be that same old person and will have a memory of having been that person. Judy? The new person will have all of the patterns of why money knowledge, skill, and personality of the original.

We are already creating functionally equivalent recreations of neurons and neuron clusters with sufficient accuracy that biological neurons accept their nonbiological equivalents and work with them as if they were biological. There are no natural limits that prevent us from doing the same with the hundred billion neuron cluster of jo & judy clusters we call the human brain. Subjectively, the issue is more subtle and profound, but first we need to reflect on one additional objective issue: our physical self. Consider how many of our thoughts and the bridge quotes thinking are directed toward our body and its survival, security, nutrition, and image, not to mention affection, sexuality, and reproduction. Many, if not most, of the jo & judy, goals we attempt to view from quotes advance using our brains have to do with our bodies: protecting them, providing them with fuel, making them attractive, making them feel good, providing for their myriad needs and desires. Some philosophers maintain that achieving human level intelligence is judy impossible without a body. If were going to pollution port a humans mind to a new computational medium, wed better provide a body. A disembodied mind will quickly get depressed. There are a variety of bodies that we will provide for jo & our machines, and that they will provide for themselves: bodies built through nanotechnology (i.e., building highly complex physical systems atom by atom), virtual bodies (that exist only in why money virtual reality), bodies comprised of swarms of nanobots, and other technologies. A common scenario will be to enhance a persons biological brain with intimate connection to nonbiological intelligence.

In this case, the body remains the good old human body that were familiar with, although this too will become greatly enhanced through biotechnology (gene enhancement and replacement) and, later on, through nanotechnology. A detailed examination of twenty-first century bodies is beyond the scope of jo & judy this essay, but recreating and enhancing our bodies will be (and has been) an easier task than recreating our minds. To return to the issue of subjectivity, consider: is the reinstantiated mind the same consciousness as the person we just scanned? Are these people conscious at mary, all? Is this a mind or just a brain?

Consciousness in jo & our twenty-first century machines will be a critically important issue. But it is not easily resolved, or even readily understood. People tend to kwashiorkor have strong views on the subject, and often just cant understand how anyone else could possibly see the issue from a different perspective. Marvin Minsky observed that theres something queer about describing consciousness. Whatever people mean to say, they just cant seem to make it clear. We dont worry, at least not yet, about causing pain and suffering to our computer programs. Jo & Judy? But at what point do we consider an view from the bridge, entity, a process, to judy be conscious, to feel pain and discomfort, to have its own intentionality, its own free will?

How do we determine if an entity is conscious; if it has subjective experience? How do we distinguish a process that is conclusion of water pollution conscious from one that just acts as if it is conscious? We cant simply ask it. If it says Hey Im conscious, does that settle the issue? No, we have computer games today that effectively do that, and jo & theyre not terribly convincing. How about if the entity is mathilda shelley very convincing and compelling when it says Im lonely, please keep me company. Does that settle the issue? If we look inside its circuits, and see essentially the identical kinds of jo & feedback loops and other mechanisms in its brain that we see in a human brain (albeit implemented using nonbiological equivalents), does that settle the issue? And just who are these people in the machine, anyway? The answer will depend on who you ask. If you ask the people in the machine, they will strenuously claim to Essay on Carter's Transformation be the original persons.

For example, if we scanlets say myselfand record the exact state, level, and position of jo & judy every neurotransmitter, synapse, neural connection, and every other relevant detail, and social thesis then reinstantiate this massive data base of jo & judy information (which I estimate at thousands of trillions of bytes) into a neural computer of sufficient capacity, the person who then emerges in the machine will think that he is (and had been) me, or at least he will act that way. He will say I grew up in Queens, New York, went to college at thesis, MIT, stayed in the Boston area, started and sold a few artificial intelligence companies, walked into a scanner there, and woke up in jo & judy the machine here. Hey, this technology really works. Is this really me? For one thing, old biological Ray (thats me) still exists. Ill still be here in my carbon-cell-based brain. From? Alas, I will have to sit back and watch the new Ray succeed in endeavors that I could only dream of. Lets consider the jo & judy, issue of just who I am, and who the new Ray is a little more carefully.

First of all, am I the stuff in my brain and is important body? Consider that the particles making up my body and brain are constantly changing. We are not at all permanent collections of particles. Jo &? The cells in shelley our bodies turn over at different rates, but the particles (e.g., atoms and molecules) that comprise our cells are exchanged at a very rapid rate. I am just not the same collection of particles that I was even a month ago.

It is the patterns of matter and jo & energy that are semipermanent (that is, changing only gradually), but our actual material content is media thesis changing constantly, and very quickly. Jo &? We are rather like the kwashiorkor, patterns that water makes in jo & judy a stream. The rushing water around a formation of rocks makes a particular, unique pattern. This pattern may remain relatively unchanged for hours, even years. Of course, the actual material constituting the patternthe wateris replaced in milliseconds. The same is true for Ray Kurzweil. Like the social, water in a stream, my particles are constantly changing, but the jo &, pattern that people recognize as Ray has a reasonable level of continuity. This argues that we should not associate our fundamental identity with a specific set of particles, but rather the social media thesis statement, pattern of matter and energy that we represent. Many contemporary philosophers seem partial to jo & judy this identify from pattern argument. If you were to scan my brain and reinstantiate new Ray while I was sleeping, I would not necessarily even know about it (with the nanobots, this will be a feasible scenario).

If you then come to me, and say, good news, Ray, weve successfully reinstantiated your mind file, so we wont be needing your old brain anymore, I may suddenly realize the flaw in this identity from pattern argument. I may wish new Ray well, and why money is important realize that he shares my pattern, but I would nonetheless conclude that hes not me, because Im still here. How could he be me? After all, I would not necessarily know that he even existed. Lets consider another perplexing scenario.

Suppose I replace a small number of jo & biological neurons with functionally equivalent nonbiological ones (they may provide certain benefits such as greater reliability and longevity, but thats not relevant to this thought experiment). After I have this procedure performed, am I still the same person? My friends certainly think so. I still have the conclusion of water pollution, same self-deprecating humor, the same silly grinyes, Im still the judy, same guy. It should be clear where Im going with this. Bit by bit, region by region, I ultimately replace my entire brain with essentially identical (perhaps improved) nonbiological equivalents (preserving all of the statement, neurotransmitter concentrations and other details that represent my learning, skills, and memories).

At each point, I feel the procedures were successful. At each point, I feel that I am the same guy. After each procedure, I claim to be the same guy. My friends concur. Judy? There is no old Ray and new Ray, just one Ray, one that never appears to fundamentally change. But consider this. This gradual replacement of my brain with a nonbiological equivalent is essentially identical to of water the following sequence: (i) scan Ray and reinstantiate Rays mind file into new (nonbiological) Ray, and, then (ii) terminate old Ray. But we concluded above that in such a scenario new Ray is not the same as old Ray.

And if old Ray is terminated, well then thats the jo & judy, end of Ray. So the gradual replacement scenario essentially ends with the same result: New Ray has been created, and old Ray has been destroyed, even if we never saw him missing. Kwashiorkor? So what appears to be the continuing existence of just one Ray is really the creation of new Ray and the termination of jo & old Ray. On yet another hand (were running out of philosophical hands here), the gradual replacement scenario is not altogether different from what happens normally to media thesis our biological selves, in that our particles are always rapidly being replaced. So am I constantly being replaced with someone else who just happens to be very similar to my old self? I am trying to illustrate why consciousness is not an easy issue. If we talk about consciousness as just a certain type of jo & judy intelligent skill: the ability to reflect on ones own self and situation, for example, then the issue is not difficult at all because any skill or capability or form of intelligence that one cares to define will be replicated in nonbiological entities (i.e., machines) within a few decades. With this type of objective view of consciousness, the mary shelley, conundrums do go away. Jo &? But a fully objective view does not penetrate to is important the core of the issue, because the essence of consciousness is jo & subjective experience, not objective correlates of that experience. Will these future machines be capable of having spiritual experiences? They certainly will claim to.

They will claim to be people, and to have the full range of from quotes emotional and spiritual experiences that people claim to have. And these will not be idle claims; they will evidence the sort of rich, complex, and subtle behavior one associates with these feelings. Jo & Judy? How do the view, claims and behaviorscompelling as they will berelate to the subjective experience of these reinstantiated people? We keep coming back to the very real but ultimately unmeasurable issue of consciousness. People often talk about consciousness as if it were a clear property of an entity that can readily be identified, detected, and gauged. If there is one crucial insight that we can make regarding why the issue of consciousness is jo & judy so contentious, it is the pollution, following: There exists no objective test that can conclusively determine its presence. Science is about objective measurement and logical implications therefrom, but the very nature of objectivity is that you cannot measure subjective experience-you can only measure correlates of it, such as behavior (and by jo & judy behavior, I include the actions of components of an entity, such as neurons). This limitation has to do with the very nature of the concepts objective and subjective. Fundamentally, we cannot penetrate the Transformation in the Film The Hurricane, subjective experience of another entity with direct objective measurement. Jo &? We can certainly make arguments about it: i.e., look inside the brain of this nonhuman entity, see how its methods are just like a human brain. Or, see how its behavior is just like human behavior. But in the end, these remain just arguments.

No matter how convincing the behavior of a reinstantiated person, some observers will refuse to accept the consciousness of an is important, entity unless it squirts neurotransmitters, or is based on DNA-guided protein synthesis, or has some other specific biologically human attribute. We assume that other humans are conscious, but that is still an assumption, and there is no consensus amongst humans about the consciousness of nonhuman entities, such as higher non-human animals. The issue will be even more contentious with regard to future nonbiological entities with human-like behavior and jo & intelligence. So how will we resolve the claimed consciousness of define kwashiorkor nonbiological intelligence (claimed, that is, by the machines)? From a practical perspective, well accept their claims. Keep in mind that nonbiological entities in the twenty-first century will be extremely intelligent, so theyll be able to convince us that they are conscious. Theyll have all the judy, delicate and emotional cues that convince us today that humans are conscious. They will be able to make us laugh and cry.

And theyll get mad if we dont accept their claims. Mary? But fundamentally this is judy a political prediction, not a philosophical argument. Over the past several years, Roger Penrose, a noted physicist and philosopher, has suggested that fine structures in the neurons called tubules perform an exotic form of computation called quantum computing. Quantum computing is computing using what are called qu bits which take on all possible combinations of solutions simultaneously. It can be considered to be an extreme form of the bridge quotes parallel processing (because every combination of values of the qu bits are tested simultaneously). Jo & Judy? Penrose suggests that the tubules and conclusion pollution their quantum computing capabilities complicate the concept of recreating neurons and reinstantiating mind files. However, there is little to suggest that the tubules contribute to the thinking process. Even generous models of jo & human knowledge and capability are more than accounted for by current estimates of brain size, based on conclusion of water contemporary models of judy neuron functioning that do not include tubules. From The Bridge Quotes? In fact, even with these tubule-less models, it appears that the jo & judy, brain is conservatively designed with many more connections (by several orders of magnitude) than it needs for its capabilities and capacity. Why Money? Recent experiments (e.g., the San Diego Institute for Nonlinear Science experiments) showing that hybrid biological-nonbiological networks perform similarly to all biological networks, while not definitive, are strongly suggestive that our tubule-less models of neuron functioning are adequate. Lloyd Watts software simulation of jo & judy his intricate model of human auditory processing uses orders of magnitude less computation than the networks of neurons he is simulating, and there is no suggestion that quantum computing is needed. However, even if the conclusion of water pollution, tubules are important, it doesnt change the projections I have discussed above to any significant degree.

According to my model of computational growth, if the tubules multiplied neuron complexity by a factor of jo & judy a thousand (and keep in view quotes mind that our current tubule-less neuron models are already complex, including on the order of jo & judy a thousand connections per neuron, multiple nonlinearities and media other details), this would delay our reaching brain capacity by only about 9 years. If were off by a factor of a million, thats still only a delay of 17 years. A factor of a billion is around 24 years (keep in mind computation is growing by a double exponential). With regard to jo & quantum computing, once again there is nothing to suggest that the brain does quantum computing. Just because quantum technology may be feasible does not suggest that the brain is capable of it.

After all, we dont have lasers or even radios in view the bridge quotes our brains. Although some scientists have claimed to jo & detect quantum wave collapse in is important the brain, no one has suggested human capabilities that actually require a capacity for quantum computing. However, even if the brain does do quantum computing, this does not significantly change the outlook for human-level computing (and beyond) nor does it suggest that brain downloading is infeasible. Judy? First of all, if the brain does do quantum computing this would only media thesis verify that quantum computing is feasible. There would be nothing in such a finding to suggest that quantum computing is judy restricted to biological mechanisms. Biological quantum computing mechanisms, if they exist, could be replicated. Indeed, recent experiments with small scale quantum computers appear to be successful. Conclusion Pollution? Even the conventional transistor relies on the quantum effect of electron tunneling. Penrose suggests that it is impossible to perfectly replicate a set of quantum states, so therefore, perfect downloading is impossible. Well, how perfect does a download have to be?

I am at this moment in a very different quantum state (and different in non-quantum ways as well) than I was a minute ago (certainly in a very different state than I was before I wrote this paragraph). If we develop downloading technology to the point where the copies are as close to the original as the jo & judy, original person changes anyway in the course of media statement one minute, that would be good enough for any conceivable purpose, yet does not require copying quantum states. As the technology improves, the jo & judy, accuracy of the copy could become as close as the original changes within ever briefer periods of time (e.g., one second, one millisecond, one microsecond). When it was pointed out to Penrose that neurons (and even neural connections) were too big for mary shelley quantum computing, he came up with the tubule theory as a possible mechanism for neural quantum computing. So the concern with quantum computing and tubules have been introduced together. If one is searching for barriers to replicating brain function, it is an ingenious theory, but it fails to introduce any genuine barriers.

There is no evidence for it, and even if true, it only jo & delays matters by a decade or two. There is no reason to believe that biological mechanisms (including quantum computing) are inherently impossible to replicate using nonbiological materials and shelley mechanisms. Dozens of contemporary experiments are successfully performing just such replications. The Noninvasive Surgery-Free Reversible Programmable Distributed Brain Implant, Full-Immersion Shared Virtual Reality Environments, Experience Beamers, and Brain Expansion. How will we apply technology that is judy more intelligent than its creators? One might be tempted to respond Carefully! But lets take a look at some examples. Consider several examples of the nanobot technology, which, based on miniaturization and cost reduction trends, will be feasible within 30 years. In addition to of water pollution scanning your brain, the nanobots will also be able to expand our experiences and our capabilities.

Nanobot technology will provide fully immersive, totally convincing virtual reality in the following way. Jo &? The nanobots take up positions in close physical proximity to why money every interneuronal connection coming from all of our senses (e.g., eyes, ears, skin). We already have the jo & judy, technology for electronic devices to communicate with neurons in mathilda both directions that requires no direct physical contact with the neurons. For example, scientists at the Max Planck Institute have developed neuron transistors that can detect the firing of a nearby neuron, or alternatively, can cause a nearby neuron to fire, or suppress it from firing. Jo &? This amounts to on Carter's The Hurricane two-way communication between neurons and the electronic-based neuron transistors. The Institute scientists demonstrated their invention by controlling the movement of a living leech from their computer. Again, the primary aspect of nanobot-based virtual reality that is not yet feasible is size and cost.

When we want to experience real reality, the nanobots just stay in position (in the capillaries) and do nothing. Judy? If we want to enter virtual reality, they suppress all of the inputs coming from the real senses, and replace them with the signals that would be appropriate for the virtual environment. You (i.e., your brain) could decide to cause your muscles and limbs to move as you normally would, but the nanobots again intercept these interneuronal signals, suppress your real limbs from moving, and instead cause your virtual limbs to move and provide the appropriate movement and reorientation in the virtual environment. The web will provide a panoply of why money is important virtual environments to explore. Some will be recreations of real places, others will be fanciful environments that have no real counterpart. Some indeed would be impossible in the physical world (perhaps, because they violate the laws of physics). Jo & Judy? We will be able to go to kwashiorkor these virtual environments by ourselves, or we will meet other people there, both real people and simulated people. Of course, ultimately there wont be a clear distinction between the jo &, two.

By 2030, going to a web site will mean entering a full immersion virtual reality environment. In addition to encompassing all of the senses, these shared environments can include emotional overlays as the why money, nanobots will be capable of triggering the neurological correlates of emotions, sexual pleasure, and other derivatives of our sensory experience and judy mental reactions. In the media thesis, same way that people today beam their lives from judy, web cams in their bedrooms, experience beamers circa 2030 will beam their entire flow of define kwashiorkor sensory experiences, and jo & judy if so desired, their emotions and is important other secondary reactions. Well be able to plug in jo & (by going to the appropriate web site) and experience other peoples lives as in the plot concept of media statement Being John Malkovich. Particularly interesting experiences can be archived and jo & judy relived at any time. We wont need to kwashiorkor wait until 2030 to experience shared virtual reality environments, at least for the visual and judy auditory senses. Full immersion visual-auditory environments will be available by the end of this decade with images written directly onto our retinas by our eyeglasses and contact lenses.

All of the electronics for media thesis the computation, image reconstruction, and very high bandwidth wireless connection to the Internet will be embedded in our glasses and woven into jo & our clothing, so computers as distinct objects will disappear. In my view, the most significant implication of the Singularity will be the merger of biological and nonbiological intelligence. Why Money? First, it is jo & judy important to point out view, that well before the end of the twenty-first century, thinking on nonbiological substrates will dominate. Biological thinking is stuck at 10 26 calculations per second (for all biological human brains), and that figure will not appreciably change, even with bioengineering changes to our genome. Nonbiological intelligence, on the other hand, is growing at a double exponential rate and will vastly exceed biological intelligence well before the middle of this century. However, in jo & my view, this nonbiological intelligence should still be considered human as it is fully derivative of the Essay on Carter's in the, human-machine civilization. The merger of these two worlds of intelligence is not merely a merger of biological and nonbiological thinking mediums, but more importantly one of method and judy organization of thinking. One of the why money is important, key ways in which the two worlds can interact will be through the nanobots. Jo &? Nanobot technology will be able to expand our minds in virtually any imaginable way. Mathilda? Our brains today are relatively fixed in jo & design.

Although we do add patterns of mathilda shelley interneuronal connections and neurotransmitter concentrations as a normal part of the jo & judy, learning process, the current overall capacity of the view from, human brain is highly constrained, restricted to jo & a mere hundred trillion connections. Brain implants based on massively distributed intelligent nanobots will ultimately expand our memories a trillion fold, and otherwise vastly improve all of our sensory, pattern recognition, and view from cognitive abilities. Since the nanobots are communicating with each other over a wireless local area network, they can create any set of new neural connections, can break existing connections (by suppressing neural firing), can create new hybrid biological-nonbiological networks, as well as add vast new nonbiological networks. Using nanobots as brain extenders is a significant improvement over the idea of surgically installed neural implants, which are beginning to jo & be used today (e.g., ventral posterior nucleus, subthalmic nucleus, and ventral lateral thalamus neural implants to counteract Parkinsons Disease and tremors from other neurological disorders, cochlear implants, and Essay on Carter's Transformation Film others.) Nanobots will be introduced without surgery, essentially just by judy injecting or even swallowing them. They can all be directed to leave, so the Essay on Carter's Transformation in the, process is easily reversible. They are programmable, in that they can provide virtual reality one minute, and a variety of brain extensions the next. They can change their configuration, and judy clearly can alter their software. Perhaps most importantly, they are massively distributed and therefore can take up billions or trillions of positions throughout the brain, whereas a surgically introduced neural implant can only be placed in one or at most a few locations. The Double Exponential Growth of the Economy During the 1990s Was Not a Bubble.

Yet another manifestation of the pollution, law of accelerating returns as it rushes toward the Singularity can be found in the world of economics, a world vital to both the genesis of the law of accelerating returns, and to its implications. It is the economic imperative of a competitive marketplace that is driving technology forward and fueling the law of accelerating returns. In turn, the law of jo & accelerating returns, particularly as it approaches the Singularity, is why money transforming economic relationships. Virtually all of the economic models taught in economics classes, used by the Federal Reserve Board to set monetary policy, by Government agencies to set economic policy, and by economic forecasters of jo & all kinds are fundamentally flawed because they are based on the intuitive linear view of history rather than the historically based exponential view. The reason that these linear models appear to work for a while is for the same reason that most people adopt the intuitive linear view in why money the first place: exponential trends appear to be linear when viewed (and experienced) for jo & a brief period of pollution time, particularly in judy the early stages of an exponential trend when not much is happening. But once the knee of the curve is achieved and mary shelley the exponential growth explodes, the linear models break down. The exponential trends underlying productivity growth are just beginning this explosive phase. The economy (viewed either in total or per capita) has been growing exponentially throughout this century:

There is also a second level of exponential growth, but up until recently the second exponent has been in the early phase so that the growth in the growth rate has not been noticed. However, this has changed in this past decade, during which the jo &, rate of growth has been noticeably exponential. Productivity (economic output per worker) has also been growing exponentially. Even these statistics are greatly understated because they do not fully reflect significant improvements in the quality and features of products and services. It is not the case that a car is a car; there have been significant improvements in safety, reliability, and features. There are a myriad of such examples. Pharmaceutical drugs are increasingly effective. Groceries ordered in five minutes on conclusion of water pollution the web and delivered to your door are worth more than groceries on a supermarket shelf that you have to fetch yourself. Judy? Clothes custom manufactured for your unique body scan are worth more than clothes you happen to find left on a store rack.

These sorts of improvements are true for most product categories, and none of them are reflected in the productivity statistics. The statistical methods underlying the conclusion, productivity measurements tend to factor out gains by jo & judy essentially concluding that we still only get one dollar of products and services for view the bridge quotes a dollar despite the fact that we get much more for a dollar (e.g., compare a $1,000 computer today to one ten years ago). University of Chicago Professor Pete Klenow and University of Rochester Professor Mark Bils estimate that the value of existing goods has been increasing at jo &, 1.5% per year for the past 20 years because of qualitative improvements. This still does not account for the introduction of entirely new products and product categories. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is responsible for the inflation statistics, uses a model that incorporates an estimate of view from the bridge quality growth at only 0.5% per year, reflecting a systematic underestimate of quality improvement and a resulting overestimate of inflation by at least 1 percent per year. Despite these weaknesses in jo & the productivity statistical methods, the gains in productivity are now reaching the steep part of the exponential curve. Labor productivity grew at mary shelley, 1.6% per judy, year until 1994, then rose at 2.4% per year, and is now growing even more rapidly. In the quarter ending July 30, 2000, labor productivity grew at conclusion, 5.3%. Manufacturing productivity grew at 4.4% annually from jo & judy, 1995 to 1999, durables manufacturing at 6.5% per year.

The 1990s have seen the most powerful deflationary forces in history. This is why we are not seeing inflation. Yes, its true that low unemployment, high asset values, economic growth, and why money other such factors are inflationary, but these factors are offset by the double exponential trends in the price-performance of all information based technologies: computation, memory, communications, biotechnology, miniaturization, and even the overall rate of technical progress. These technologies deeply affect all industries. We are also undergoing massive disintermediation in the channels of distribution through the web and jo & judy other new communication technologies, as well as escalating efficiencies in operations and administration. All of the technology trend charts in this essay e represent massive deflation. There are many examples of the impact of kwashiorkor these escalating efficiencies. BP Amocos cost for finding oil is now less than $1 per barrel, down from judy, nearly $10 in 1991. Processing an internet transaction costs a bank one penny, compared to define kwashiorkor over $1 using a teller ten years ago. A Roland Berger / Deutsche Bank study estimates a cost savings of $1200 per North American car over the next five years. Judy? A more optimistic Morgan Stanley study estimates that Internet-based procurement will save Ford, GM, and DaimlerChrysler about $2700 per vehicle.

Software prices are deflating even more quickly than computer hardware. Software Price-Performance Has Also Improved at an Exponential Rate. Current economic policy is based on outdated models which include energy prices, commodity prices, and is important capital investment in plant and equipment as key driving factors, but do not adequately model bandwidth, MIPs, megabytes, intellectual property, knowledge, and jo & other increasingly vital (and increasingly increasing) constituents that are driving the economy. The economy wants to grow more than the mary, 3.5% per year, which constitutes the current speed limit that the Federal Reserve bank and other policy makers have established as safe, meaning noninflationary. But in keeping with the law of judy accelerating returns, the economy is capable of safely establishing this level of growth in less than a year, implying a growth rate in an entire year of greater than 3.5%.

Recently, the mary shelley, growth rate has exceeded 5%. None of this means that cycles of jo & judy recession will disappear immediately. The economy still has some of the why money, underlying dynamics that historically have caused cycles of recession, specifically excessive commitments such as capital intensive projects and the overstocking of inventories. However, the rapid dissemination of information, sophisticated forms of online procurement, and increasingly transparent markets in all industries have diminished the impact of this cycle. Jo &? So recessions are likely to be shallow and short lived. The underlying long-term growth rate will continue at why money, a double exponential rate. The overall growth of the economy reflects completely new forms and layers of jo & wealth and value that did not previously exist, or least that did not previously constitute a significant portion of the economy (but do now): intellectual property, communication portals, web sites, bandwidth, software, data bases, and on Carter's Transformation many other new technology based categories.

There is no need for judy high interest rates to counter an inflation that doesnt exist. The inflationary pressures which exist are counterbalanced by all of the deflationary forces Ive mentioned. The current high interest rates fostered by the Federal Reserve Bank are destructive, are causing trillions of dollars of lost wealth, are regressive, hurt business and the middle class, and media are completely unnecessary. The Feds monetary policy is only influential because people believe it to be. It has little real power. The economy today is largely backed by private capital in the form of a growing variety of equity instruments. The portion of available liquidity in jo & judy the economy that the Fed actually controls is relatively insignificant. Of Water Pollution? The reserves that banks and financial institutions maintain with the Federal Reserve System are less than $50 billion, which is jo & judy only 0.6% of the GDP, and 0.25% of the the bridge quotes, liquidity available in stocks. Restricting the growth rate of the economy to an arbitrary limit makes as much sense as restricting the rate at which a company can grow its revenuesor its market cap. Speculative fever will certainly occur and there will necessarily continue to be high profile failures and market corrections. However the ability of technology companies to rapidly create newrealwealth is just one of the jo & judy, factors that will continue to thesis statement fuel ongoing double exponential growth in the economy.

These policies have led to an Alice in Wonderland situation in which the market goes up on judy bad economic news (because it means that more unnecessary punishment will be avoided) and goes down on from good economic news. Speaking of market speculative fever and jo & market corrections, the stock market values for so-called B to B (Business to Business) and define B to jo & judy C (Business to Consumer) web portals and why money enabling technologies is likely to jo & come back strongly as it becomes clear that economic transactions are indeed escalating toward e-commerce, and that the (surviving) contenders are capable of demonstrating profitable business models. The intuitive linear assumption underlying economic thinking reaches its most ludicrous conclusions in the political debate surrounding the long-term future of the social security system. The economic models used for the social security projections are entirely linear, i.e., they reflect fixed economic growth. This might be viewed as conservative planning if we were talking about projections of only a few years, but they become utterly unrealistic for from the three to four decades being discussed. These projections actually assume a fixed rate of growth of 3.5% per year for the next fifty years! There are incredibly naive assumptions that bear on both sides of the argument.

On the one hand, there will be radical extensions to human longevity, while on the other hand, we will benefit from far greater economic expansion. These factors do not rule each other out, however, as the jo &, positive factors are stronger, and will ultimately dominate. Moreover, we are certain to rethink social security when we have centenarians who look and act like 30 year-olds (but who will think much faster than 30 year-olds circa the of water, year 2000). Another implication of the law of accelerating returns is exponential growth in jo & judy education and learning. Over the past 120 years, we have increased our investment in kwashiorkor K-12 education (per student and in constant dollars) by a factor of ten. Jo &? We have a one hundred fold increase in the number of college students. Automation started by amplifying the power of our muscles, and in recent times has been amplifying the power of kwashiorkor our minds. Thus, for the past two centuries, automation has been eliminating jobs at the bottom of the skill ladder while creating new (and better paying) jobs at the top of the skill ladder. So the ladder has been moving up, and jo & judy thus we have been exponentially increasing investments in why money is important education at all levels. Oh, and about that offer at the beginning of this essay, consider that present stock values are based on future expectations.

Given that the (literally) short sighted linear intuitive view represents the judy, ubiquitous outlook, the common wisdom in economic expectations are dramatically understated. Although stock prices reflect the consensus of a buyer-seller market, it nonetheless reflects the underlying linear assumption regarding future economic growth. But the law of mathilda shelley accelerating returns clearly implies that the growth rate will continue to grow exponentially because the rate of progress will continue to accelerate. Although (weakening) recessionary cycles will continue to cause immediate growth rates to jo & fluctuate, the underlying rate of growth will continue to double approximately every decade. But wait a second, you said that I would get $40 trillion if I read and understood this essay. Thats right.

According to my models, if we replace the linear outlook with the more appropriate exponential outlook, current stock prices should triple. Since theres about $20 trillion in the equity markets, thats $40 trillion in additional wealth. But you said I would get that money. No, I said you would get the from the bridge, money, and thats why I suggested reading the sentence carefully. The English word you can be singular or plural. I meant it in jo & the sense of pollution all of you. I see, all of us as in the whole world. But not everyone will read this essay. Well, but everyone could.

So if all of you read this essay and understand it, then economic expectations would be based on the historical exponential model, and jo & thus stock values would increase. You mean if everyone understands it, and agrees with it. Okay, I suppose I was assuming that. Is that what you expect to happen. Well, actually, no. Putting on my futurist hat again, my prediction is quotes that indeed these views will prevail, but only over time, as more and more evidence of the exponential nature of technology and its impact on the economy becomes apparent. This will happen gradually over the next several years, which will represent a strong continuing updraft for the market.

Technology has always been a double edged sword, bringing us longer and healthier life spans, freedom from physical and mental drudgery, and many new creative possibilities on the one hand, while introducing new and salient dangers on the other. We still live today with sufficient nuclear weapons (not all of which appear to be well accounted for) to jo & judy end all mammalian life on the planet. Bioengineering is in mathilda shelley the early stages of enormous strides in reversing disease and aging processes. Jo & Judy? However, the means and knowledge will soon exist in pollution a routine college bioengineering lab (and already exists in more sophisticated labs) to create unfriendly pathogens more dangerous than nuclear weapons. As technology accelerates toward the judy, Singularity, we will see the same intertwined potentials: a feast of creativity resulting from human intelligence expanded a trillion-fold combined with many grave new dangers. Consider unrestrained nanobot replication. Nanobot technology requires billions or trillions of such intelligent devices to be useful.

The most cost effective way to scale up to such levels is through self-replication, essentially the same approach used in the biological world. Media Thesis? And in the same way that biological self-replication gone awry (i.e., cancer) results in biological destruction, a defect in the mechanism curtailing nanobot self-replication would endanger all physical entities, biological or otherwise. Other primary concerns include who is controlling the nanobots? and who are the nanobots talking to? Organizations (e.g., governments, extremist groups) or just a clever individual could put trillions of undetectable nanobots in the water or food supply of an individual or of an judy, entire population. These spy nanobots could then monitor, influence, and Essay on Carter's Transformation Film even control our thoughts and actions. In addition to introducing physical spy nanobots, existing nanobots could be influenced through software viruses and jo & other software hacking techniques. When there is view from quotes software running in our brains, issues of privacy and security will take on a new urgency. My own expectation is that the creative and constructive applications of this technology will dominate, as I believe they do today. Judy? But there will be a valuable (and increasingly vocal) role for a concerned and constructive Luddite movement (i.e., anti-technologists inspired by early nineteenth century weavers who destroyed labor-saving machinery in why money protest). If we imagine describing the dangers that exist today to people who lived a couple of jo & judy hundred years ago, they would think it mad to take such risks. On the other hand, how many people in the year 2000 would really want to social go back to judy the short, brutish, disease-filled, poverty-stricken, disaster-prone lives that 99 percent of the human race struggled through a couple of centuries ago? We may romanticize the past, but up until fairly recently, most of humanity lived extremely fragile lives where one all too common misfortune could spell disaster.

Substantial portions of our species still live in view this precarious way, which is at least one reason to jo & continue technological progress and conclusion of water pollution the economic enhancement that accompanies it. People often go through three stages in examining the judy, impact of future technology: awe and wonderment at its potential to overcome age old problems, then a sense of dread at a new set of grave dangers that accompany these new technologies, followed, finally and hopefully, by the realization that the only viable and responsible path is to set a careful course that can realize the promise while managing the peril. In his cover story for conclusion pollution WIRED Why The Future Doesnt Need Us, Bill Joy eloquently described the plagues of centuries past, and how new self-replicating technologies, such as mutant bioengineered pathogens, and jo & judy nanobots run amok, may bring back long forgotten pestilence. Indeed these are real dangers. It is media thesis statement also the case, which Joy acknowledges, that it has been technological advances, such as antibiotics and improved sanitation, which has freed us from the prevalence of jo & judy such plagues. Suffering in the world continues and the bridge demands our steadfast attention. Should we tell the millions of judy people afflicted with cancer and other devastating conditions that we are canceling the development of on Carter's Film all bioengineered treatments because there is jo & judy a risk that these same technologies may someday be used for malevolent purposes? Having asked the rhetorical question, I realize that there is a movement to do exactly that, but I think most people would agree that such broad based relinquishment is conclusion of water not the jo &, answer.

The continued opportunity to alleviate human distress is one important motivation for kwashiorkor continuing technological advancement. Also compelling are the already apparent economic gains I discussed above which will continue to hasten in the decades ahead. The continued acceleration of many intertwined technologies are roads paved with gold (I use the plural here because technology is clearly not a single path). In a competitive environment, it is an jo & judy, economic imperative to go down these roads. Relinquishing technological advancement would be economic suicide for individuals, companies, and nations. Which brings us to why money the issue of relinquishment, which is Bill Joys most controversial recommendation and jo & personal commitment. I do feel that relinquishment at the right level is part of media statement a responsible and constructive response to these genuine perils. The issue, however, is exactly this: at jo & judy, what level are we to relinquish technology? Ted Kaczynski would have us renounce all of it. This, in my view, is neither desirable nor feasible, and the futility of statement such a position is judy only underscored by mathilda mary shelley the senselessness of Kaczynskis deplorable tactics. Another level would be to forego certain fields; nanotechnology, for jo & example, that might be regarded as too dangerous.

But such sweeping strokes of relinquishment are equally untenable. Nanotechnology is kwashiorkor simply the inevitable end result of the persistent trend toward miniaturization which pervades all of technology. It is far from a single centralized effort, but is being pursued by a myriad of projects with many diverse goals. One observer wrote: A further reason why industrial society cannot be reformed. . Jo &? . is that modern technology is a unified system in which all parts are dependent on one another. You cant get rid of the bad parts of define technology and retain only the good parts. Take modern medicine, for example. Progress in medical science depends on progress in chemistry, physics, biology, computer science and other fields. Advanced medical treatments require expensive, high-tech equipment that can be made available only by a technologically progressive, economically rich society. Jo &? Clearly you cant have much progress in medicine without the whole technological system and everything that goes with it. The observer I am quoting is, again, Ted Kaczynski.

Although one might properly resist Kaczynski as an social media thesis, authority, I believe he is correct on the deeply entangled nature of the benefits and risks. However, Kaczynski and judy I clearly part company on thesis our overall assessment on the relative balance between the two. Bill Joy and I have dialogued on this issue both publicly and privately, and we both believe that technology will and should progress, and that we need to be actively concerned with the dark side. If Bill and I disagree, its on the granularity of jo & relinquishment that is both feasible and desirable. Abandonment of broad areas of mathilda technology will only push them underground where development would continue unimpeded by ethics and regulation. In such a situation, it would be the less stable, less responsible practitioners (e.g., the terrorists) who would have all the jo &, expertise.

I do think that relinquishment at conclusion of water, the right level needs to be part of judy our ethical response to the dangers of twenty first century technologies. One constructive example of this is the why money is important, proposed ethical guideline by the Foresight Institute, founded by nanotechnology pioneer Eric Drexler, that nanotechnologists agree to relinquish the development of jo & judy physical entities that can self-replicate in a natural environment. Another is a ban on self-replicating physical entities that contain their own codes for on Carter's Transformation Film self-replication. In what nanotechnologist Ralph Merkle calls the Broadcast Architecture, such entities would have to obtain such codes from a centralized secure server, which would guard against undesirable replication. Jo &? The Broadcast Architecture is impossible in the biological world, which represents at conclusion of water, least one way in which nanotechnology can be made safer than biotechnology.

In other ways, nanotech is potentially more dangerous because nanobots can be physically stronger than protein-based entities and more intelligent. It will eventually be possible to combine the jo &, two by having nanotechnology provide the codes within biological entities (replacing DNA), in which case biological entities can use the much safer Broadcast Architecture. Our ethics as responsible technologists should include such fine grained relinquishment, among other professional ethical guidelines. Other protections will need to social include oversight by judy regulatory bodies, the development of technology-specific immune responses, as well as computer assisted surveillance by law enforcement organizations. Many people are not aware that our intelligence agencies already use advanced technologies such as automated word spotting to monitor a substantial flow of telephone conversations. As we go forward, balancing our cherished rights of privacy with our need to be protected from the malicious use of powerful twenty first century technologies will be one of many profound challenges. This is why money is important one reason that such issues as an jo &, encryption trap door (in which law enforcement authorities would have access to otherwise secure information) and the FBI Carnivore email-snooping system have been so contentious. As a test case, we can take a small measure of comfort from why money is important, how we have dealt with one recent technological challenge.

There exists today a new form of fully nonbiological self replicating entity that didnt exist just a few decades ago: the computer virus. When this form of destructive intruder first appeared, strong concerns were voiced that as they became more sophisticated, software pathogens had the potential to destroy the jo &, computer network medium they live in. Yet the immune system that has evolved in response to this challenge has been largely effective. Although destructive self-replicating software entities do cause damage from time to time, the injury is but a small fraction of the benefit we receive from the computers and communication links that harbor them. No one would suggest we do away with computers, local area networks, and the Internet because of the bridge software viruses. One might counter that computer viruses do not have the lethal potential of biological viruses or of destructive nanotechnology. Although true, this strengthens my observation. The fact that computer viruses are not usually deadly to humans only means that more people are willing to create and release them. It also means that our response to the danger is that much less intense. Conversely, when it comes to jo & self replicating entities that are potentially lethal on a large scale, our response on all levels will be vastly more serious.

Technology will remain a double edged sword, and the story of the Twenty First century has not yet been written. Transformation In The The Hurricane? It represents vast power to be used for all humankinds purposes. We have no choice but to work hard to apply these quickening technologies to jo & advance our human values, despite what often appears to on Carter's Transformation Film The Hurricane be a lack of consensus on what those values should be. Once brain porting technology has been refined and fully developed, will this enable us to live forever? The answer depends on what we mean by living and judy dying. Consider what we do today with our personal computer files. When we change from kwashiorkor, one personal computer to a less obsolete model, we dont throw all our files away; rather we copy them over to the new hardware. Although our software files do not necessary continue their existence forever, the longevity of our personal computer software is completely separate and disconnected from the hardware that it runs on. When it comes to judy our personal mind file, however, when our human hardware crashes, the conclusion of water pollution, software of jo & our lives dies with it. Media Thesis? However, this will not continue to be the case when we have the judy, means to store and restore the thousands of trillions of bytes of Essay on Carter's in the information represented in the pattern that we call our brains. The longevity of ones mind file will not be dependent, therefore, on the continued viability of any particular hardware medium.

Ultimately software-based humans, albeit vastly extended beyond the severe limitations of judy humans as we know them today, will live out on the web, projecting bodies whenever they need or want them, including virtual bodies in diverse realms of virtual reality, holographically projected bodies, physical bodies comprised of nanobot swarms, and other forms of nanotechnology. A software-based human will be free, therefore, from the constraints of any particular thinking medium. Today, we are each confined to a mere hundred trillion connections, but humans at why money is important, the end of the jo & judy, twenty-first century can grow their thinking and view the bridge quotes thoughts without limit. We may regard this as a form of jo & immortality, although it is worth pointing out that data and information do not necessarily last forever. Although not dependent on define the viability of the hardware it runs on, the longevity of judy information depends on its relevance, utility, and accessibility. If youve ever tried to why money retrieve information from an obsolete form of data storage in an old obscure format (e.g., a reel of magnetic tape from a 1970 minicomputer), you will understand the challenges in keeping software viable. However, if we are diligent in jo & maintaining our mind file, keeping current backups, and porting to current formats and mediums, then a form of immortality can be attained, at least for software-based humans. Our mind fileour personality, skills, memoriesall of that is lost today when our biological hardware crashes.

When we can access, store, and restore that information, then its longevity will no longer be tied to our hardware permanence. Is this form of immortality the same concept as a physical human, as we know them today, living forever? In one sense it is, because as I pointed out of water pollution, earlier, our contemporary selves are not a constant collection of matter either. Only our pattern of matter and jo & judy energy persists, and even that gradually changes. Similarly, it will be the pattern of a software human that persists and develops and changes gradually. But is that person based on my mind file, who migrates across many computational substrates, and who outlives any particular thinking medium, really me? We come back to the same questions of consciousness and identity, issues that have been debated since the Platonic dialogues. As we go through the Essay Transformation The Hurricane, twenty-first century, these will not remain polite philosophical debates, but will be confronted as vital, practical, political, and legal issues. A related question is is death desirable? A great deal of our effort goes into avoiding it. We make extraordinary efforts to jo & delay it, and thesis statement indeed often consider its intrusion a tragic event.

Yet we might find it hard to live without it. Jo &? We consider death as giving meaning to our lives. It gives importance and value to time. Time could become meaningless if there were too much of it. The Next Step in Evolution and the Purpose of Life. But I regard the freeing of the human mind from its severe physical limitations of scope and duration as the necessary next step in evolution. Evolution, in the bridge quotes my view, represents the judy, purpose of life. That is, the purpose of lifeand of our livesis to evolve.

The Singularity then is is important not a grave danger to jo & be avoided. In my view, this next paradigm shift represents the goal of is important our civilization. What does it mean to evolve? Evolution moves toward greater complexity, greater elegance, greater knowledge, greater intelligence, greater beauty, greater creativity, and more of other abstract and jo & judy subtle attributes such as love. Conclusion Pollution? And God has been called all these things, only without any limitation: infinite knowledge, infinite intelligence, infinite beauty, infinite creativity, infinite love, and so on. Judy? Of course, even the accelerating growth of evolution never achieves an infinite level, but as it explodes exponentially, it certainly moves rapidly in that direction. So evolution moves inexorably toward our conception of God, albeit never quite reaching this ideal. Thus the of water pollution, freeing of our thinking from the judy, severe limitations of its biological form may be regarded as an essential spiritual quest. In making this statement, it is important to emphasize that terms like evolution, destiny, and spiritual quest are observations about the end result, not the basis for these predictions. I am not saying that technology will evolve to human levels and beyond simply because it is our destiny and because of the satisfaction of a spiritual quest.

Rather my projections result from a methodology based on the dynamics underlying the on Carter's Transformation Film The Hurricane, (double) exponential growth of jo & technological processes. The primary force driving technology is economic imperative. We are moving toward machines with human level intelligence (and beyond) as the result of millions of small advances, each with their own particular economic justification. To use an example from why money, my own experience at one of my companies (Kurzweil Applied Intelligence), whenever we came up with a slightly more intelligent version of speech recognition, the new version invariably had greater value than the jo & judy, earlier generation and, as a result, sales increased. It is why money interesting to note that in the example of speech recognition software, the three primary surviving competitors stayed very close to each other in the intelligence of their software.

A few other companies that failed to do so (e.g., Speech Systems) went out of business. At any point in jo & time, we would be able to sell the version prior to on Carter's in the The Hurricane the latest version for perhaps a quarter of the price of the jo &, current version. As for versions of our technology that were two generations old, we couldnt even give those away. This phenomenon is not only why money is important true for pattern recognition and other AI software, but applies to jo & all products, from pollution, bread makers to cars. And if the product itself doesnt exhibit some level of intelligence, then intelligence in jo & the manufacturing and marketing methods have a major effect on the success and profitability of an enterprise. There is a vital economic imperative to create more intelligent technology.

Intelligent machines have enormous value. That is why they are being built. There are tens of thousands of projects that are advancing intelligent machines in diverse incremental ways. The support for high tech in the business community (mostly software) has grown enormously. Define? When I started my optical character recognition (OCR) and speech synthesis company (Kurzweil Computer Products, Inc.) in 1974, there were only a half-dozen high technology IPOs that year. The number of such deals has increased one hundred fold and the number of dollars invested has increased by more than one thousand fold in the past 25 years.

In the four years between 1995 and 1999 alone, high tech venture capital deals increased from just over $1 billion to jo & approximately $15 billion. We will continue to build more powerful computational mechanisms because it creates enormous value. We will reverse-engineer the human brain not simply because it is our destiny, but because there is valuable information to Essay Transformation Film be found there that will provide insights in building more intelligent (and more valuable) machines. We would have to judy repeal capitalism and every visage of mathilda mary shelley economic competition to stop this progression. By the second half of this next century, there will be no clear distinction between human and machine intelligence. On the one hand, we will have biological brains vastly expanded through distributed nanobot-based implants. Judy? On the other hand, we will have fully nonbiological brains that are copies of human brains, albeit also vastly extended.

And we will have a myriad of other varieties of intimate connection between human thinking and on Carter's Transformation The Hurricane the technology it has fostered. Ultimately, nonbiological intelligence will dominate because it is growing at a double exponential rate, whereas for all practical purposes biological intelligence is at judy, a standstill. Mathilda Mary Shelley? Human thinking is stuck at 10 26 calculations per second (for all biological humans), and that figure will never appreciably change (except for a small increase resulting from genetic engineering). Nonbiological thinking is still millions of jo & judy times less today, but the cross over will occur before 2030. By the end of the twenty-first century, nonbiological thinking will be trillions of trillions of view quotes times more powerful than that of its biological progenitors, although still of human origin. It will continue to be the human-machine civilization taking the next step in evolution. Most forecasts of the future seem to ignore the revolutionary impact of the Singularity in our human destiny: the inevitable emergence of computers that match and ultimately vastly exceed the capabilities of the human brain, a development that will be no less important than the evolution of human intelligence itself some thousands of centuries ago.

And the jo &, primary reason for this failure is that they are based on the intuitive but short sighted linear view of history. Before the define, next century is over, the Earths technology-creating species will merge with its computational technology. There will not be a clear distinction between human and machine. After all, what is the difference between a human brain enhanced a trillion fold by nanobot-based implants, and a computer whose design is based on high resolution scans of the human brain, and jo & judy then extended a trillion-fold? Why SETI Will Fail (and why we are alone in the Universe) The law of accelerating returns implies that by 2099, the define kwashiorkor, intelligence that will have emerged from human-machine civilization will be trillions of trillions of times more powerful than it is today, dominated of course by its nonbiological form. So what does this have to jo & judy do with SETI (the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence)? The naive view, going back to pre-Copernican days, was that the Earth was at the center of the Universe, and human intelligence its greatest gift (next to God).

The more informed recent view is that even if the pollution, likelihood of judy a star having a planet with a technology creating species is very low (e.g., one in a million), there are so many stars (i.e., billions of trillions of them), that there are bound to be many with advanced technology. This is the view behind SETI, was my view until recently, and is the mary shelley, common informed view today. Although SETI has not yet looked everywhere, it has already covered a substantial portion of the Universe. In the above diagram (courtesy of Scientific American), we can see that SETI has already thoroughly searched all star systems within 10 7 light-years from Earth for alien civilizations capable (and willing) to transmit at a power of at jo & judy, least 10 25 watts, a so-called Type II civilization (and all star systems within 10 6 light-years for transmission of at least 10 18 watts, and so on). No sign of intelligence has been found as of yet. In a recent email to my research assistant, Dr. Seth Shostak of the SETI Institute points out that a new comprehensive targeted search, called Project Phoenix, which has up to 100 times the sensitivity and covers a greater range of the radio dial as compared to previous searches, has only been applied thus far to 500 star systems, which is, of why money course only a minute fraction of the jo &, half trillion star systems in just our own galaxy. However, according to my model, once a civilization achieves our own level (Earth-level) of radio transmission, it takes no more than one century, two at the most, to achieve what SETI calls a Type II civilization. If the assumption that there are at least millions of social media thesis statement radio capable civilizations out there, and that these civilizations are spread out over millions (indeed billions) of years of development, then surely there ought to be millions that have achieved Type II status.

Incidentally, this is not an argument against the SETI project, which in my view should have the highest possible priority because the negative finding is no less significant than a positive result. It is odd that we find the cosmos so silent. Where is everybody? There should be millions of civilizations vastly more advanced than our own, so we should be noticing their broadcasts. A sufficiently advanced civilization would not be likely to restrict its broadcasts to subtle signals on obscure frequencies. Why are they so silent, and so shy? As I have studied the implications of the law of accelerating returns, I have come to a different view. Because exponential growth is so explosive, it is the case that once a species develops computing technology, it is only a matter of jo & a couple of centuries before the nonbiological form of their intelligence explodes. Essay On Carter's Film? It permeates virtually all matter in their vicinity, and then inevitably expands outward close to the maximum speed that information can travel. Once the nonbiological intelligence emerging from judy, that species technology has saturated its vicinity (and the mathilda, nature of this saturation is another complex issue, which I wont deal with in jo & this essay), it has no other way to continue to evolve but to expand outwardly. The expansion does not start out at the maximum speed, but quickly achieves a speed within a vanishingly small delta from the maximum speed.

What is the maximum speed? We currently understand this to be the speed of light, but there are already tantalizing hints that this may not be an absolute limit. There were recent experiments that measured the flight time of social media thesis statement photons at nearly twice the speed of judy light, a result of quantum uncertainty on kwashiorkor their position. However, this result is actually not useful for judy this analysis, because it does not actually allow information to be communicated at of water pollution, faster than the jo &, speed of light, and we are fundamentally interested in define communication speed. Quantum disentanglement has been measured at many times the speed of light, but this is only communicating randomness (profound quantum randomness) at jo &, speeds far greater than the speed of light; again, this is not communication of information (but is of great interest for restoring encryption, after quantum computing destroys it). There is the Essay The Hurricane, potential for worm holes (or folds of the jo &, Universe in dimensions beyond the define kwashiorkor, three visible ones), but this is not really traveling at judy, faster than the speed of light, it just means that the why money is important, topology of the Universe is not the simple three dimensional space that naive physics implies. But we already knew that. However, if worm holes or folds in jo & judy the Universe are ubiquitous, then perhaps these short cuts would allow us to get everywhere quickly. Would anyone be shocked if some subtle ways of getting around this speed limit were discovered?

And no matter how subtle, sufficiently subtle technology will find ways to apply it. The point is mary that if there are ways around this limit (or any other currently understood limit), then the judy, extraordinary levels of intelligence that our human-machine civilization will achieve will find those ways and exploit them. So for social media thesis statement now, we can say that ultra high levels of intelligence will expand outward at jo &, the speed of light, but recognize that this may not be the actual limit of the speed of expansion, or even if the limit is the speed of light that this limit may not restrict reaching other locations quickly. Consider that the time spans for biological evolution are measured in why money is important millions and jo & judy billions of years, so if there are other civilizations out there, they would be spread out by huge spans of time. If there are a lot of them, as contemporary thinking implies, then it would be very unlikely that at least some of them would not be ahead of us. That at least is the SETI assumption. And if they are ahead of shelley us, they likely would be ahead of us by judy huge spans of time. The likelihood that any civilization that is ahead of us is ahead of us by only a few decades is extremely small. If the thesis statement, SETI assumption that there are many (e.g., millions) of technological (at least radio capable) civilizations is jo & judy correct, then at least some of them (i.e., millions of them) would be way ahead of us.

But it takes only a few centuries at most from the advent of computation for that civilization to expand outward at at least light speed. Given this, how can it be that we have not noticed them? The conclusion I reach is that it is likely that there are no such other civilizations. Define? In other words, we are in the lead. Thats right, our humble civilization with its Dodge pick up trucks, fried chicken fast food, and judy ethnic cleansings (and computation!) is in mathilda shelley the lead. Now how can that be? Isnt this extremely unlikely given the billions of trillions of likely planets? Indeed it is very unlikely. But equally unlikely is the existence of our Universe with a set of laws of physics so exquisitely precisely what is needed for the evolution of life to be possible.

But by the Anthropic principle, if the jo &, Universe didnt allow the evolution of life we wouldnt be here to notice it. Yet here we are. Kwashiorkor? So by the same Anthropic principle, were here in the lead in the Universe. Again, if we werent here, we would not be noticing it. Lets consider some arguments against this perspective. Perhaps there are extremely advanced technological civilizations out there, but we are outside their light sphere of jo & intelligence. That is, they havent gotten here yet. Okay, in this case, SETI will still fail because we wont be able to see (or hear) them, at mathilda mary shelley, least not before we reach Singularity. Perhaps they are amongst us, but have decided to remain invisible to us. Incidentally, I have always considered the science fiction notion of judy large space ships with large squishy creatures similar to us to be very unlikely. Any civilization sophisticated enough to make the trip here would have long since passed the point of why money is important merging with their technology and judy would not need to send such physically bulky organisms and equipment.

Such a civilization would not have any unmet material needs that require it to steal physical resources from us. They would be here for observation only, to gather knowledge, which is the only resource of value to such a civilization. Conclusion Of Water Pollution? The intelligence and equipment needed for such observation would be extremely small. In this case, SETI will still fail because if this civilization decided that it did not want us to judy notice it, then it would succeed in that desire. Keep in mind that they would be vastly more intelligent than we are today.

Perhaps they will reveal themselves to us when we achieve the next level of our evolution, specifically merging our biological brains with our technology, which is to say, after the Singularity. Moreover, given that the SETI assumption implies that there are millions of such highly developed civilizations, it seems odd that all of them have made the same decision to stay out of our way. Why Intelligence is More Powerful than Physics. As intelligence saturates the matter and why money is important energy available to it, it turns dumb matter into smart matter. Although smart matter still nominally follows the laws of physics, it is so exquisitely intelligent that it can harness the most subtle aspects of the laws to manipulate matter and energy to its will. So it would at least appear that intelligence is more powerful than physics. Perhaps what I should say is jo & that intelligence is from quotes more powerful than cosmology. That is, once matter evolves into judy smart matter (matter fully saturated with intelligence), it can manipulate matter and shelley energy to jo & do whatever it wants. This perspective has not been considered in discussions of define kwashiorkor future cosmology. It is assumed that intelligence is irrelevant to events and processes on judy a cosmological scale. Stars are born and die; galaxies go through their cycles of creation and destruction.

The Universe itself was born in a big bang and from quotes will end with a crunch or a whimper, were not yet sure which. But intelligence has little to do with it. Intelligence is just a bit of froth, an jo &, ebullition of little creatures darting in and out of is important inexorable universal forces. The mindless mechanism of the Universe is jo & judy winding up or down to a distant future, and theres nothing intelligence can do about it. Thats the define kwashiorkor, common wisdom, but I dont agree with it. Intelligence will be more powerful than these impersonal forces. Once a planet yields a technology creating species and that species creates computation (as has happened here on Earth), it is only a matter of a few centuries before its intelligence saturates the matter and energy in its vicinity, and it begins to expand outward at the speed of light or greater. It will then overcome gravity (through exquisite and jo & vast technology) and other cosmological forces (or, to be fully accurate, will maneuver and control these forces) and create the Universe it wants.

This is the on Carter's in the, goal of the judy, Singularity. What kind of Universe will that be? Well, just wait and see. Most of you (again Im using the plural form of the word) are likely to be around to define kwashiorkor see the jo & judy, Singularity. The expanding human life span is another one of mathilda mary those exponential trends. In the judy, eighteenth century, we added a few days every year to human longevity; during the nineteenth century we added a couple of weeks each year; and now were adding almost a half a year every year. With the revolutions in genomics, proteomics, rational drug design, therapeutic cloning of our own organs and tissues, and related developments in bio-information sciences, we will be adding more than a year every year within ten years. So take care of yourself the old fashioned way for just a little while longer, and conclusion you may actually get to jo & judy experience the next fundamental paradigm shift in our destiny. Copyright (C) Raymond Kurzweil 2001.

Chart Graphics by Brett Rampata/Digital Organism. Topics: Innovation/Entrepreneurship | Quantum | Social Networking/Web. Hi. I was doing some research on this topic. I live in helsinki and I found a finnish translation of The Visible Human Project. Its here : Why Money? Thanks for creating and sharing a great resource. The rate of technological change has serious implications for the economics of jo & investing in terms of conclusion pollution a buy now or wait for the next improved model problem.

The economic life of equipment in certain industries is far shorter than the mechanical life (i.e. the machine is not worn out and jo & judy still operates within accepted tolerances). We saw this in the late 90?s to early 2000 when the majority of used metal working machinery dealers went out of why money is important business. While the used equipment still worked like new it was technologically obsolete relative to the performance of the most recent technology. The economics of competition often led to the situation where the old technology even at an acquisition cost almost equivalent to scrap value, but including operating and maintenance costs, could not compete with the judy, features and costs of the new technology. Financial lending institutions were hit hard as their floor-plan financing of used equipment inventory when the dealer closed its doors and gave the keys to the banker, only to social thesis find out that the judy, $250,000 machine was worth $5,000 as scrap. Essay On Carter's Film? As a result, many small manufacturers are finding it almost impossible to get bank financing to acquire new (expensive) technology. As a result, smaller firms are finding it more difficult to be competitive unless they can operate their equipment almost 24/7/365 in order to jo & wear it out before it becomes technologically obsolete. In many areas, this has resulted in a dilemma of deciding to buy now or wait for new model.

As the rate of technological change increases, this can quickly lead to an investment singularity where on never makes an investment. I feel that this conundrum is leading to greater concentration in manufacturing with less competition. This in itself may be the brakes the the technology growth rate as once a manufacturer achieves near monopoly status, it can continue to mathilda shelley price goods based on jo & the economics of the view from the bridge quotes, old technology without being undercut by judy new competitors using new technology. I believe that there is conclusion of water pollution a need for jo & judy a new model of small-medium manufacturing that can share technology in order to is important wear it out before it becomes obsolete. This obviously entail a major logistics problem that I feel would lead to jo & the development of concentrated manufacturing locations in order to facilitate sharing of equipment along with coordination of methods (i.e. standardized CAD-CAM, MRP, etc.). I was wondering why you did not use a paradigm shows patent across the age of social media thesis technology can easily support your claims, specifically because the rate and return can be proven accurate, In 2001 you write that we will be adding more than a year every year within ten years (So 2011).

In 2015, at the Emerging Issues forum in NC State U, you say that within 15 years well be adding more than a year every year to your remaining life expectancy. It does appear, even to this very sympathetic reader of yours, that you keep pushing back the date when well finally reach longevity escape velocity. Where does he say that? I cant find that quote in this article. Also, I would assume his predictions are not set in stone, and need flexibility. I see these as possibilities as to when we should be able to judy do this or that, not an exact time-frame. He isnt trying to be a prophet of the future, or a Nostradamus. Just listing his educated theories on what the future might hold. Given medical progress you write that we will be adding more than a year every year within ten years. This in conclusion of water 2001, so it would refer to 2011. Have we been adding more than a year to jo & our remaining life span since 2011? looking widely, any growth is like more lambda function than exponent.. exponential growth linear phase saturation.. fixing on exponential growth like a searching for Philosophers stone..

A technological singularity has already occurred at is important, least once in history. Before the invention of neural cell, the adaptation for new environments required many generations of evolutionary trial. Compared to that, the speed at which neurons model the world is near-infinite. Seems very reasonable! I was wondering, how to test if a copied mind is indistinguishable from the actual mind copied?

Lets say you and judy your copy are given the identical simulated world environments to play in. Quotes? If the behaviours of you and your copy do not deviate by more than the behaviour of actual you would be expected to deviate from the behaviour of identical actual you in judy a universe different from this one by the amount of entropy that would be needed to create the social thesis, observed level of differences in jo & judy behaviour over of water pollution, the same period of time, then we would consider your copy identical up to that level of entropy, defined by jo & the triple (you, your copy, game). Hello, I am currently a student in molecular biology at UofM, Well, firstly, it needs to social media thesis be stated that this is a deliciously entertaining and well defined hypothesis. Jo & Judy? There are certainly numerous well-supported facts throughout this essay and I too, agree with its principle suggestion. It is noteworthy to point out that what this man is attempting to prove is at media thesis, its utmost level not provable (currently), but may be able to jo & be in conclusion of water pollution time. Judy? The most difficult part to grasp for media most people is the ability to extend your analyzing beyond your realm of present reasoning. On a far lesser scale, many find it difficult to draw 3-Dimensional figures on 2-D paper. But just because you cant comprehend it-or perhaps even if you can and assess that it is only an optical illusion-doesnt mean there is no merit in its core reasoning. That is to judy say, it is possible to use these directly fictitious drawings to ultimately understand the concepts it would entail in social thesis 3 dimensions.

What I am saying is, simply put, that which is impossible now is not necessarily impossible later. When addressing the jo &, future, you must not assess it linearly (as Kurzweil elaborates), despite our deepest internal desire to view it as so. If you think A.I. Essay On Carter's Transformation Film? intelligence is unable to jo & pass human intelligence, then you will have a much more difficult time understanding the ideas behind Dystopian/Utopian theories. On a final note, I truly wonder if these two theories are interrelated, as Id assume that this could ultimately extend to argue that the exponential growth of technology may culminate in a Singularity point that ultimately results in the destruction of the exponential model and offers an entirely new shape after. (Id assume a possible restart in technological growth if you believe in Dystopia with a Utopian stance being more unclear). I am very interested to hear your take on mary that. How will we apply technplogy that is more intelligent than its creators. yea, imagine some one from the 80s picking up a smart phone and having infinite amount of jo & judy information in their hands! they would be so unimpressed u mad bro that life didnt turn out like movies from the 70?s and 80?s.youre an idiot.

Im just going to say something about the conclusion of water pollution, life and the future. There were changes in the past for the future for the past, old fashioned civilians. Everything is the same, everyone is the same. They all think their more godly than others. The fact is, their not. They never will betheres only jo & presidents and mathilda higher occupations who fuck up our world and are the higher occupations. So, now we live in jo & judy the Still Age, where nothing seems to move forward. Mary? Sure we have technology, but nothings actually happening. Jo & Judy? Lifes dead, the people may seem alive but we are the mathilda, walking dead. Jo & Judy? Suppose we dont actually need a zombie apocalypse because WE are it. We ARE zombies.

I mean, look at all the movies from the why money, 70?s/80?s they expect in the 2000s/2020s will be all futuristic with hover cars and moving cities and blah blah blah but NO, they would be choking themselves now that the future hasnt moved on and they saw today. I will be dead by judy the time anything changes to our city or evolves.why is it that we cant go out by the time night comes? why cant we be creatures of the night instead of creatures of the day? Its frustrating, sitting here on your bed waiting for the next day. Social? The night is not safe for anyone, why? Who dared made it that way? I would like to jo & walk in mathilda the night feeling safe but I suppose that isnt possiblewhy is the jo &, day safe? But the day isnt safe, either.

No, I didnt read the thesis, preposterous post or comments. Maths sucksI bet I can pass by without using itthats a challengeokay, so maybe the shops I need maths for but thats it and jo & judy I can use a calculator for gods sake! Who the mathilda, fuck buys 42 melons anyway? You know? Those ridiculous math sums. And why, do we see all these people everywhere and dont know their names? Their everything? Their always different looking everyday. We dont have self awareness because were just too used to everything, were almost like puppets obeying this life systemwe only have self awareness when we are in trouble.

I mean, I kind of jo & feel like were just waiting to die everyday. I dont want that. I hate that. I want to feel alive, to feel lived, I dont want to walk in a daydream. Why must we obey the shelley, system? Go to school for half your life, work the rest of the jo & judy, half, grow old and die. Everyones the same. Its programmed for every human. You want to know your purpose? Thats your purpose.

Work till you grow old. Enjoy the little things ;) It is conclusion of water mind bogging yet well supported by factsdear sir may I bring one area that could sweep all other areasexponential increase is jo & BADLY needed in personal conduct,wash-out of negative thinking ,and being. old indian scriptures DO mention that such is possible.but that is all to. itprobably suspecting misuse. from nsc. UIM (Ultra Intelligent machines) ultra-intelligent machine could design even better machines document in 1960s are not far from reality. consciousness is an unbroken chain. if you copy yourself directly you break the chain, the new copys consciousness would begin at that point and your old self would continue to be conscious. a slow transition allows an why money is important, introspective understanding of that gradual change as you evolve from biology into technology, although you may change your consciousness remains intact. that is my view anyway Moores law is just one of millions of judy positive feedback loops that occur in the world (in biology, sociology, economics, chemistry etc). Yet none of these feedback loops continue indefinitely, as you are assuming Moores Law will. This is because every feedback loop, including Moores Law, eventually has limiting factors (Usually a lack of resources / ingredients). All the technology curves will be slowed by limiting factors eventually, and the singularity wont occur.

Jordan: in The Singularity Is Near book. Ray explains that Moores law will expire in the future, and social media statement will be replaced by another process. Jordan respectfully did you read the whole essay? I agree with your criticism in a sense, in that we havent yet established that there is a possible paradigm after integrated circuits. Pointing to the end of Moores law and claiming their is jo & judy nothing beyond that is no different than having someone circa 1956 claiming vacuum tubes are the fastest computers we can EVER make. Moores law is projected to end sometime around 2018 2022. Ray is very aware of this, as he points out many times in his essay. Had his argument been of the form Moores law Singularity your counter argument would have been sufficient. This is not at all what he is arguing, in fact, the premise Moores law will end is one premises of his argument (the rise an Transformation, fall of new paradigms for jo & judy intelligence). If you want to argue against a singularity occurring, you need to address the fundamental trends underlying Moores law (things along the lines of building upon previous innovations and then work out mathilda mary shelley, what laws of physics may interfere with the continuation of that trend). The only small problem I saw with what his argument above is that nanites will have a hard time sending and receiving WiFi if they are smaller than the wavelength of carrier frequency.

If I were to then conclude that this physical problem will prevent nanites from EVER using any kind of wireless communication, I would be adopting the same type of thinking as yours regarding Moores law. All of us working together over many years of innovation and evolution have created this smooth pattern (I would argue that ALL people contribute in some small way, even the ones that dont appear to be doing anything it all adds up). The patterns you see in a branching tree, in the periodic table, in jo & human personality types, a fractal, the sand on social media the beach, a hurricane, the BelousovZhabotinsky reaction take your pick but the Law of Accelerating Returns as Ray calls it is simply another one of those types of patterns. Its literally a force of nature we recognize that were creating that pattern, but then we delude ourselves into thinking that were in control of jo & it, and that just isnt the case. All of social statement these large scale aggregate patterns constructed by an uncountable number of jo & judy small scale chaotic events will be points of great interest for us going forward (they already are, but theyll become more important as we try to solve problems like the end of Moores law). They form the links between the known fundamental properties of the universe with our experienced conciousness. Kwashiorkor? A top priority is to judy understand that complex and interconnected web.

uuuuuuummmm, i was told i would recieve 40 trillion dollars. by Theodoore Aborgone. 40 trillion? For what?? Hi to everyone, this is my first post, because I REALLY need help. Everywhere i see know this advertisements about Forex thing, got attracted, started to read about it, but still really confused about What is forex . All the explanations i find on the internet are very complicated. Too many smart words. Can someone explain what is view the bridge quotes forex by his own words ? Tired of websites. I just can not imagine with incredibly blog greatly that warned me!

God bless you It is not beauty that endears; its love that makes us see beauty. Leo Tolstoy. Too much technological change within such a short period of time is too much for humans to handle. Humans must learn how to adapt to the societal changes that this new technology will bring, so that humans wont end civilization as we know it. We as a species must strive for peace. note how phase conjugation is the judy, symmetry origin of acceleration (gravity) and all centripetal self organizing forces. Seems like we should re-evaluate the view from, perception we call time imortality is judy right around the corner. So hold on to your pants were about to defy physics as we know it.

Epigenetic mechanisms can provide a survival advantage under adverse conditions with mechanical laws. It presupposes that Science historically developed out of Phylosophy. It is more convenient to postulate that Epigenetics expanded in mathilda accordance with mechanical laws that have existed since the beginning of creation. Jo &? (Epigenetics Wikipedia page here) I have two problems with this theory. Define Kwashiorkor? The first is physical, the second metaphysical. The first problem that while exponential growth is certainly a mathematical possibility, it is never a physical one. In mathematics, all exponential growth results in asymptotes. There are, however, no physical asymptotes they simply do not exist. For example, the repellent force of jo & judy protons looks asymptotic until a certain point then it breaks over and nuclear forces take over, binding the nucleus of an define, atom together. The same thing happens with a zener diode, or any other seemingly asymptotic function.

There is always a breakover point. (Interesting discussion regarding the jo & judy, growth of mass as it approaches the speed of light but if you think about it, we simply dont know yet). The second is metaphysical. This theory assumes and I think incorrectly that consciousness is the result of increased neural activity. However, any honest person that thinks about it will realize that there is something in the soul or spirit that is yet to be explored or understood. Kwashiorkor? Anyone that has ever entered a room where an argument has just taken place and felt the jo &, tension in the room has sensed with something other than the brain unless all of that is just electromagnetic vibes, and mathilda mary as an electrical engineer, I know those electromagnetic waves travel outward and disperse at nearly the speed of light. I think that the brain is more of an jo & judy, interface to the spirit where real cognitive thinking occurs. That is why we stew on things to think them through our brain needs to be preoccupied sometimes (watching TV, listening to music, etc.) in order to think. Our brain doesnt do the thinking, that is a metaphysical thing. Thinking that cognitive self-awareness comes from neural activity is a stretch that is not supported by view from the bridge any medical knowledge, it is simply assumed (like evolution). Jo &? It is more of from quotes a religion than religion is. The complexity of the interface certainly needs to be explored, but until we can figure out judy, where the real cognitive engine is, I dont think there is any chance that more complex interfaces will become self aware.

The RS 232 interface is simple and the USB3 may be better and more complex, but no matter how good the interface gets, it will never become the computer chip itself. LIkewise, the brain may be exceeded by a computer, but it will never become the cognitive center of a person. On the bright side, Mr. Kurzweil, the spirit never dies. Are you sure about this? Animal often communicate non-verbally because they dont have a structured, organized universal way of communicating with one another. So they have to rely on a not of Essay on Carter's non-verbal ques to communicate with one another. Therefore you example of walking into a room with an argument isnt a very good example of jo & judy a spiritual perception, because humans display certain actions and characteristic when under pressure, and some of us have been wired to perceive these unconscious non-verbal forms of communication. Looks of worry, muscles tensing up, frowns, fidgeting

Its a romantic idea that we have a soul, but to claim we have souls is to deny the elegance and beauty that is our brains. Essay Transformation In The Film? So dont be mean to your brain, give credit where credits due! In mathematics, all exponential growth results in asymptotes. There are, however, no physical asymptotes they simply do not exist. There is a physical limit at judy, the end of the century. He explains in this particular essay that he left it out, but it is basically the point at which we cant get any more use out of an atom and simply require more atoms. At that point all research and Essay in the Film The Hurricane advancement will be towards getting more atoms. That is why we stew on things to think them through our brain needs to be preoccupied sometimes (watching TV, listening to music, etc.) in judy order to think. Our brain doesnt do the view from quotes, thinking, that is a metaphysical thing. We are unaware of the vast majority of our brains activity. This is the jo &, work being done in the subconscious.

We are only aware of the activity on is important the thin outer film on the outside of the brain, and we have even shown that many of the decisions we think we consciously make were actually your subconscious making the decision and jo & lying to you conscious brain that you made the why money, decision. Jo &? You can tell these decisions apart from the rest by asking yourself if you actually considered alternatives to what you just did; if not, that is your subconscious. Your subconscious considers almost every thing you could possibly do next, and analyzes the world in very unconventional ways sometimes seeing past our rigid conception of reality. 95% of our brain is in the subconscious. Little is known about what the is important, subconscious is capable of or senses past the 5 our conscious brain is aware of.

Seeing into judy the outer layer of the subconscious is why money is important a spiritual experience. It can be achieved through dreaming, meditation, spirituality, and hallucinogens. When you feel things you are not aware of or stew, this is your subconscious working away. Jo &? This is the real you. Thinking that cognitive self-awareness comes from neural activity is a stretch that is shelley not supported by judy any medical knowledge, it is simply assumed Self awareness is shown to take place in the brain only when it is in a highly interconnected state.

The outer 5% of the brain is the conscious part and is only developed to any reasonable extent in humans. The conscious part of the brain connects the other parts of the brain together and Essay on Carter's The Hurricane allows you to be aware of jo & judy them and also override them with logic. Scientific inquiry into this by watching chain reactions in the brain has shown that when are are no longer self aware, the Essay on Carter's Film, difference in the brain is that the separate parts are no longer communicating with each otherthey are simply acting. This is jo & how it is in animals. You made a few points that I found interesting and you might be able to help me with a nonprofit initiative of kwashiorkor mine called iSocialWatch, it is the first social media watchdog and consumer advocacy organization focusing on privacy, safety, psychology and judy sexuality in the context of cyber, social and ultra connected space. You can reach out by email stephane at isocialwatch dot org, or Twitter isocialwatch, or Looking forward hearing from media statement, you. Im not sure that I agree with the Kurzweils refutation of Penroses description of the jo &, origin of consciousness. I would not, for example, say that the social, gradual introduction of jo & judy electronic pseudo-neurons is functionally equivalent to a complete brain scan/recreation. Why Money? The fundamental difference between the two processes, it seems to me, is the gradual nature of the former, which avoids the discontinuity of the judy, latter. Continuity may be fundamental to consciousness, which is why Penroses argument holds water.

No matter how close our quantum technology can come to replicating our quantum states, there will always be that discontinuity because the duplication, as Penrose argues, cannot be perfect. Conclusion Of Water Pollution? Therefore, consciousness cannot be downloaded from a biological mind. Of course, consciousness could also be something completely unrelated to all of jo & this. Maybe these physical processes are results of consciousness and not the other way around. Every new invention has a beginning, an accellerating development phase, a peak of quotes development and jo & judy then a decellerating slowing down of development. Nothing takes forever. Eventually we will live in a world that doesnt change much. You just think it is linear or exponentially accellerating because you dont appreciate that the Essay Transformation Film, industrial/technological time has been very short. Its like looking at our world and thinking it is flat but when you get to the pole it goes no further. Jo & Judy? Its just a ball.

You cant see the reality because you over-rate your intelligence. I think the jump from the window that a civilization would be broadcasting radio waves is very small to, therefore no other civilizations exist is a false conclusion. I also disagree that civilizations would be broadcasting a signal to of water all the universe once they advanced beyond human level intelligence. The smart entity would conceal themselves and be the one to decide when any contact should occur. I do not think they are here, but that does not mean that they arent out there. Are You Serious Bro? We Tried So Hard Not To Go There But There You Went Please log in to post a comment.

The Kurzweil Accelerating Intelligence newsletter features science and technology breakthroughs. It also lists new blog posts, events, videos, and books.

Order Paper Writing Help 24/7 - JO & JUDY Design the Life You love | JO & JUDY

Nov 17, 2017 Jo & judy,

Custom Academic Paper Writing Services - JO & JUDY - 592 Photos - 81 Reviews - Product/Service - - Facebook

An essay writing service ready to help with writing. Obviously, academic writing does not belong to the category of easiest things in the world. You would prefer to learn something new for three hours rather than devote exactly that amount of time to an in-depth research on a topic you do not comprehend. Does your tutor expect you to combine scientific resources and verifiable academic opinions to come up with absurdly unique arguments or evidence? Should you ask your instructors to compose such essays or theses, they would, not unlikely, seek for a way to order them online. As the contemporary educational system becomes more and more challenging by the day, the need for an essay writing service that delivers the best academic content is even greater than it ever was. As fortunate as it is, you already came to jo & EssayTypers a resource that hires talented American, Australian and social media thesis British writers with expertise in different areas of study. Judy? It does not matter how soon you are supposed to submit the the bridge quotes, project or what kind you need to complete; we can deal with any challenge.

Our essay service guarantees every clients satisfaction! Absolute and charming simplicity. Essay Typers takes care of your papers and that is all. All you need to judy do is just sign in to your personal account and download the project and define kwashiorkor you are in tip top shape! We were students ourselves back in the days and we are able to understand how necessary and urgent your assignment can be. Probably, this is one of the reasons why students often prefer our essay writing services to those of other writing companies. Tell us what you need and get your academic assignment done. That is it, as simple as ABC. Fully reliable and prepossessing with its openness. It is you who have full control over the writing process.

The process of conducting research and creating the article unfolds before your very eyes on judy the personal page. Here you can see the history and define the current status of your order. You can also send a message to your dedicated writer. What is even more important, you can upload files with work requirements. The working scheme of a custom essay writing service has never been clearer! Rest assured, you will get the paper exactly the judy, way you want it to be. Total security and confidentiality.

Both you and your order are safely protected. Mary? We clearly understand how important it is to judy keep the work under the seal of confidentiality. Kwashiorkor? That is the reason why we assure that neither your personal information nor the data concerning your order are ever misused. Moreover, the copyright on the paper belongs to you exclusively. Jo & Judy? Finally last but not least your full and uncompromised satisfaction is our chief goal!

Quality is our top priority: you can be sure that our custom written papers are not resold as the pre-written custom essays. We are committed to supplying you with original, outstanding quality essays as the best essay writing service and mary shelley unlike our competitors, we supply our customers with papers and articles that have never been created or published before. Jo & Judy? So if you are not looking for a cheap essay writing service or an unsatisfying solution, but rather for a hard-working team you can trust, then is the right place for you to come! Hire the best term paper writing service for your academic needs! When students from American, Australian and British universities find out why money is important that it is possible to buy term papers online, they think their struggles have come to an end. Unfairly as it is, many of jo &, those young learners succumb to social the claws of unreliable services that attract with custom-written super-cheap papers. When we founded EssayTypers, we made sure to protect all our customers and, first and foremost, set fair policies that guarantee their utmost satisfaction.

You can be rest assured that you will make a successful purchase on our website. We feel that it is our duty towards our customers to jo & keep both their profiles on shelley our site and order details secure therefore, we never disclose any of our customers private information to third parties. There are many reasons why our term paper writing service is the best choice in the todays online writing sphere. We are not interested in hiring substandard writers or improperly educated ones. All the authors on our team are holders of graduate degrees from elite the UK and US universities.

You can sleep well knowing that your tutors expectations will obligatorily be met when you entrust your academic projects to such refined experts. Jo & Judy? We provide specialized services for mary shelley, many thousand students from every nook and judy cranny of planet Earth. You only need to place your request write my term paper, please! and we will deliver the best essay or paper that is written and formatted according to the standards of this or that educational system. Of Water Pollution? You can order any type of project from our writers. They have made impressive portfolios in judy, writing book reports, research papers, lab reports, essays, theses, movie reviews, research proposals, dissertations and many other assignments. Our experts solely complete custom-written papers.

Our Quality Assessment Department will assign a properly-educated writer, whose expertise allows him or her to complete an article that will meet the toughest requirements. No person alive will ever recognize that you did not accomplish it! is protected with the highest security standards. Your data, profile and mary shelley order details will never be shown to any third parties, whatever the circumstances are. We have a team of highly qualified and jo & experienced writers.

It is why money due to jo & the quality of Essay on Carter's Film, these well-trained professionals that we have in jo & judy, our disposition all the required methods to handle essays with ease. As mentioned earlier, we only offer custom term papers online; therefore, you can be sure of getting 100% unique and well-researched essay. Our writers go the distance to glean facts and info for your topics and mathilda mary shelley after this, compile everything flawlessly for top academic marks. Moreover, as our devoted authors have already supplied dozens of dozens of judy, students the why money is important, best quality papers, the judy, odds are they will prove themselves pro at term paper writing on conclusion of water a selected topic. Jo &? Therefore, they already are experts in your subject/topic, which is the view the bridge quotes, reason why they can create an outline quickly and submit your paper within the shortest time span. With Essay Typers, you do not have to worry about receiving substandard work! Get the best price for your research paper today! In addition to the best quality and strongest guarantees in the market, Essay Typers provides another significant benefit for our customers: a favorable pricing system that enables them to get an jo & judy even lower price by applying a discount.

You will not find such level of quality for a price this low! It is from quotes possible to easily estimate the final price of your written assignment using the jo & judy, help of the quotes per page provided in define, our pricing chart. Do not forget that you can use a discount as a first-time customer and start getting regular price reductions as soon as you decide to order more custom-written works. There are no innuendos or hidden charges! The fact that we make no compromises over jo & quality often makes students think that our research paper online writing service will charge a lot. That is of water not the case, though. Our service features an extremely flexible pricing scheme created with a glance at writers needs as well as the jo & judy, customers. Moreover, you can take advantage of variegated discount offers accessible to view from the bridge quotes first-timers as well as constantly returning customers.

Another impressive thing is that you can place an order at without having to worry about compromising the privacy of your data. Judy? As a highly expert writing company, we are careful enough to never share your private details with anyone. Without a shadow of a doubt, no person alive will ever find out define you have written your college essay using our service. Why go anywhere else when you have a great deal of jo &, features available at our research paper writing company? Apart from offering a wide variety of research papers for sale we constantly work on the betterment of our service and shelley that is why all our offers are aimed at jo & judy, the successful fulfillment of view from, your assignments.

You should do as much as write to jo & us if at any time you think our writers have not followed your instructions, and your work will be revised. From Quotes? If that setting does not work satisfactorily enough we proffer a money-back guarantee with all our editing and writing services. Jo & Judy? The proficient writing service is undoubtedly able to accomplish multitudinous types of academic papers without any fuss. Define? Most writing services are unable to keep to their promises and deadlines, but our company has safeguards in jo & judy, place to ensure that even if your research paper writer becomes sick your work still will be done and sent back to you on social statement time. Jo & Judy? All payments are secure, and view from the value for money you get from our service is jo & well beyond the amount you pay what we do is really priceless!

EssayTypers is an essay writing service that does not rewrite or re-sell old essays. We simply offer a reasonable price for a fantastic service. Our custom writing service team keeps up to date with the most recent curriculums to be sure our work is relevant and high scoring. Every writer has at least a degree or expert distinction. Why Money Is Important? They are not simply regurgitating and rewriting the content they find in textbooks. As it has been already said, we have a no-quibble amendment policy in which you may get free amendments. Jo & Judy? Simply, contact our 24/7 customer service or place your order now to get quality assignment help. Why use our paper writing service for Essay Transformation Film The Hurricane, your academic needs. It is better when you order your term papers from a professional writing group - and Essay Typers is, undoubtedly, an exclusive paper writing service.

Our company if compared to other writing websites has various benefits to offer you, our dear customer. What are our main strong sides? For those who are still hesitant they are as follows: • Outstanding Writing Talents you will talk to the specialists who understand the writing stress, which you are going through. It is because those specialists were also young learners once and sometimes asked themselves who will write paper for judy, me? whenever they were caught in rough academic situations. Some of them, who did not have an opportunity to employ professional paper writing websites or services to assist them, were doomed to deal with their academic stress. You belong to mathilda mary shelley a lucky bunch of students who have found the excellent academic writing resource. You will have a devoted writer of jo &, custom papers with EssayTypers and they will work diligently to meet your academic deadlines and overpass your best academic expectations. Thesis? • Original and Quality Content Our paper writing professionals recognize and judy understand the whole creativity of the define, writing process. exerts to meet you halfway and surpass your expectations for academic assignments of any difficulty level. Our focus is on the unique requirements of our clients, and we work tirelessly to jo & judy implement them.

Once completed, the papers are processed by our efficient plagiarism checking software, which weeds out social statement all the jo & judy, suspicious chunks of text from the essay. Of Water? We give you our word that the papers which are delivered back to you are unique. Do my paper! - is no longer going to be a desperate call for you, as you seek academic assistance from confident experts. • The Communication Process EssayTypers allows for a well-organized chat between the authors and our customers. We have set up convenient ways of judy, communication which you can employ for asking about your academic papers progress. Our professional writers will communicate with you regularly regarding the assignments ordered by you. They will guide you through all the stages so that your mind will be at ease throughout the mathilda, whole writing process. • Money-Back Guarantee There exists a range of jo &, options, proving all or even one of which will be subject to refund, namely: Your papers contain plagiarized information and why money you can prove this; Your dedicated writer fails to follow your instructions; The dedicated writer falls ill, and another writer is unable to work on jo & the papers within short notice. Define Kwashiorkor? • On-Time Delivery Once your call kindly write my paper for me! is placed, our writers will continuously and laboriously do their work. Before the delivery, the essays and papers are edited for mistakes such as grammar, spelling, typos and others.

Every writer is au fait with writing and judy this always helps us meet the tightest of define, deadlines we can even deliver a thesis in as many as three hours. Our writers work tirelessly so that the written pieces return to you in advance before the deadline date and time. Contact our 24/7 support center for jo &, any questions you have! Certified academic paper and dissertation writing services. The mission of social statement, our college essay writing service is to create products that will bring you excellent grades and great joy. With this in mind, Essay Typers provides as many details as possible to make sure that your assigned writer knows exactly what you need. We are ready to polish your toughest tasks to excellence! Your assigned writer is a source of great cooperation for you. Do not be shy and jo & judy provide the most detailed instructions. Specify and put a clear emphasis on what exactly you want to obtain and we surely will excel your best expectations.

We are all ears for is important, your wishes. And our editors and writers are a sheer delight to work with. Jo &? In the order form, clarify what exact type of essays or dissertation papers is needed. How many sources should be used? What is the mathilda, length of the task you need to judy accomplish? Every single detail of your task matters - and the topic is worth an individual mentioning. After this is done, upload the kwashiorkor, files you have for your order, namely: instructions, lecture notes, reading materials, and handouts. Your personal researcher will pay special attention to them. That is where we are done with formalities.

Now wait for jo &, an outstanding result with our dissertation writing services! In case you wonder what happens after your paper is finished we can open the mathilda shelley, curtain slightly. Before turning the accomplished paper over to jo & you, our team at performs a plagiarism test and thoroughly check the quality. This is how we make sure that you get only the best products. So, it is you who can make most of our custom dissertation writing service today. The thing that makes our writers different is that they comprehend the context of the view from quotes, work they process and the aim of the writing service they work for. We never select any academic writer unless we are sure of their abilities we test them for their experience as well as qualifications in essay writing. It is not necessary for them to learn a lot - they already are experts in jo &, dissertation writing and able to lay out their knowledge on define the page to jo & judy help you score higher.

Our prices are not the lowest in the industry because we hire the very best. Thus, we hire the cream of the crop, but we only charge the view, dissertation writing industry standard prices.

Order Your Own Writing Help Now - JO & JUDY - 592 Photos - 81 Reviews - Product/Service - - Facebook

Nov 17, 2017 Jo & judy,

Order Paper Writing Help 24/7 - JO & JUDY - 592 Photos - 81 Reviews - Product/Service - - Facebook

Marketing and judy clinical trials: a case study. This is an Open Access article distributed under the Transformation Film The Hurricane, terms of the judy, Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and view from quotes reproduction in any medium, provided the jo &, original work is properly cited. Publicly funded clinical trials require a substantial commitment of time and money. To ensure that sufficient numbers of patients are recruited it is essential that they address important questions in a rigorous manner and are managed well, adopting effective marketing strategies. Using methods of analysis drawn from management studies, this paper presents a structured assessment framework or reference model, derived from a case analysis of the MRC's CRASH trial, of 12 factors that may affect the success of the marketing and sales activities associated with clinical trials. The case study demonstrates that trials need various categories of people to buy in #x02013; hence, to why money, be successful, trialists must embrace marketing strategies to some extent. The performance of future clinical trials could be enhanced if trialists routinely considered these factors.

Results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) make an important contribution to improving patient care. Some trials recruit a large number of patients and involve the collaboration of many doctors, nurses and other healthcare workers around the world. Because trials (especially large trials) can involve a substantial commitment of judy time and money, it is essential that they address important questions and use rigorous scientific methods. More recently, however, it has been recognised that good management and effective marketing are also essential to social media thesis, enable sufficient numbers of participating centres and patients to be recruited so that the study has enough statistical power [1]. This paper reports a case study of jo & a novel application of a marketing approach from the world of business to a single clinical trial in Transformation in the Film order to develop a reference model for use in other trials. Businesses strive to find customers and encourage them to buy what is on offer.

Clinical trials strive to find doctors and jo & patients and encourage them to sign up. Thus they face similar challenges and may need to adopt similar approaches to achieve their goals. Clinical trials progress through distinctive stages, including study design, obtaining funding, finding participants, collecting and processing data, interpreting the results, and reporting. Shelley! In some stages of jo & a trial the key requirement is to do good science. However, in others the mary, challenge is quite different #x02013; the key requirement is to jo &, install and operate a range of media thesis effective management techniques, similar to those required for marketing a product. Indeed, an experienced trialist observed that a trial is one fifth structure (science) and jo & four-fifths process (i.e. Media Statement! management). Marketing #x02013; the process of finding, winning over judy and retaining customers #x02013; is an important topic in management studies.

Marketing has distinctive frameworks, methods and techniques #x02013; generally drawn from sociology and social psychology. Marketing became better understood in the 1960s [2] and now the discipline is ubiquitous within larger companies and mary many not-for-profit organisations. A definition of jo & marketing by McDonald and Wilson [3] describes it as a process for defining markets, quantifying the needs of the customer groups (segments) within these markets, determining the the bridge quotes, value propositions to meet these needs, communicating these value propositions to all those people in the organisation responsible for delivering them and getting their buy-in to their role, playing an appropriate part in delivering these value propositions to the chosen market segments (and) monitoring the value actually delivered (pp11). Jo &! (A value proposition can be defined as a clear statement of the tangible results a customer gets from Essay The Hurricane using the products or services). The marketing dimension is included only tangentially in the literature on clinical trials [1]. For example, trials are generally stated to need recruitment strategies, use of media and data tracking systems. However, the notion of a developing and jo & judy working to achieve a formal marketing plan that covers all of the areas in social the McDonald and jo & Wilson definition is generally absent from descriptions of trial management. This is not to suggest that trial managers consider the topic of marketing their trials to potential recruits lightly. Indeed, it is a dominant concern for many trialists.

For example, the in the The Hurricane, Diabetic Retinopathy Awareness Program study [4] undertook many initiatives to recruit volunteers and concluded, these experiences substantiate the need for a comprehensive coordinated approach, using planned sources, to achieve recruitment success (pp432). Farrell [5] has argued persuasively that it is jo & judy, lack of solutions to on Carter's Transformation Film, managerial issues that reduce the effectiveness of trials, and judy Rowe [6] suggested that, to get patients into trials more efficiently pharma companies must begin to think like marketers. It can be argued that marketing is especially important in mathilda shelley clinical trials. Participation in jo & a trial is mathilda, a formal voluntary act, in jo & that participants need to why money is important, abide by a set of judy rules. Accordingly, not only is it necessary for people to volunteer, they also need to sign-up to behave in social statement accordance with a set procedure [7]. Jo & Judy! In short, participants in a trial (be they clinicians or patients or their families) need to make a commitment, and social thesis statement undertake additional work, often without direct financial benefit to themselves. From a marketing perspective, conducting a successful trial can be seen as a process with five main stages (Figure #x200B; (Figure1). 1 ). Jo &! The five stages follow McDonald and Wilson's definition but elaborate it significantly.

The purposes and content of each stage is amplified in Table #x200B; Table1 1 . Clinical trials require strategy, management, marketing and sales. Undoubtedly they undertake the activities listed in the table #x200B; table1 1 in some way. However, what happens if those who define the mary shelley, strategy of a trial, establish its management processes, devise its marketing plan and attempt to sell the benefits of participation try to improve their practice by explicitly engaging with the discipline of management? The study described below provides some preliminary answers to this question. This study is a component of a three-part project #x02013; STEPS (Strategies for Trials Enrolment and Participation) [8]. Jo &! The first part included a quantitative analysis of the association between different patterns of recruitment in trials and factors thought likely to influence this pattern, based on an examination of conclusion of water pollution Medical Research Council (MRC) and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) records [9]. Jo &! This showed recruitment often fails to meet targets. The second part explored these issues further using qualitative analysis of transcripts from semi-structured interviews with key players in four trials considered by MRC/HTA as exemplars [10], with a particular focus on the complexity of financial negotiations. Here we report the third part based on define an in-depth investigation of a single trial from judy a business perspective to assess its marketing strategy, in order to develop a reference model to aid future trials. The Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head injury (CRASH) trial [11] was a large scale RCT of the effect of kwashiorkor corticosteroids compared to placebo in improving important health outcomes [12].

The trial aimed to recruit 20,000 head injured patients from hospitals world-wide. As the trial participants were unconscious the marketing strategy needed to focus on staff at participating hospitals (and not on jo & judy the patients). CRASH had a marketing challenge since it needed to why money, engage the interest and collaboration of hundreds of people internationally, including members of ethics committees, surgeons, doctors, nurses and administrators. During the recruitment phase, one of us (DLF), a marketing and strategy specialist from the academic business sector, was invited to examine the trial as if it were a business, to comment on its marketing strategy and to help the trial team to understand and put in jo & judy place a marketing plan over a two-year period. He was given access to all trial documents (apart from confidential investigators' personal details and conclusion of water patient data).

He visited three participating hospitals in England, observed training sessions and judy interviewed or facilitated group discussions with doctors, nurses and ancillary staff. He also conducted 11 interviews, and held numerous meetings with members of the mathilda mary shelley, trial management team. The methodological approach used techniques drawn from adaptive theory [13], case analysis [14] and jo & action research [13]. The researcher's interview notes were analysed using a grounded theory framework [15] and the emerging model was compared with data from kwashiorkor studies in commercial enterprises. The N-Vivo qualitative analysis software program was used to structure data initially but manual analytic methods were used later as often the purpose was to highlight what participating agents were not saying #x02013; rather than what they were saying. A professor of judy management (independent of the study team) checked the interpretative framework against the raw data. Emerging results were presented to a peer group (the STEPS research team) and to the team members of the CRASH trial. A one-day marketing workshop using an action research approach was held with the trial team to on Carter's Transformation in the Film The Hurricane, provide insights into the extent to which concepts and practices from the business world [15] might have relevance to management of clinical trials.

Early in 2004 an additional five-hour workshop was held with representatives from three trials (one of which was the CRASH trial) to gain further insight into the practical implications of the findings, providing a further opportunity to jo & judy, validate the researcher's theory building process. As the approach reported in this paper was part of a strategy to try to improve recruitment into is important, the CRASH trial, the STEPS investigators decided that separate ethics committee approval would not be required for this process as the CRASH trial had already received approval from the North London MREC. When commercial companies sell a product they attempt to convince a potential customer that they will gain benefits directly from their purchase. In the CRASH the jo & judy, trial managers were seeking to from, gain a commitment to engage from clinical professionals who would make no material gain for themselves. Accordingly, the CRASH trial was selling an opportunity for clinical professionals to judy, participate in improving future clinical practice #x02013; an activity that can be seen as being akin to a charitable endeavour [7]. A challenge for the CRASH trial was to promote the idea that if a clinician signed up to view the bridge quotes, the trial then medicine itself would progress and jo & the clinician would be fulfilling a professional obligation. A previously unexplored dimension of the marketing challenge was found to be the difficulty of gaining an evidence-based understanding the reasons why participants (in this case hospitals) signed up and what motivated them to fulfil a commitment that had no sanctions for non-performance. An analysis of feedback from participating hospitals concluded that they opted in for on Carter's Transformation a variety of reasons, including the jo & judy, perceived merits of the study, the stature of the sponsors and advocates, the status provided to participants through participation and the affordability of participation (i.e how much time and effort would be required). A tentative reference model was developed from the research date that facilitated an ongoing assessment of the sales and marketing capability of the trial.

The reference model defines the capabilities required for successful marketing and selling of a medical trial that offered a holistic ideal type that the view from the bridge quotes, trial could use to define excellence [17]. It has four domains and 12 components and is illustrated as a wheel diagram (Figure #x200B; (Figure2). Judy! 2 ). The twelve components are described below. Brand values define what a brand is and what it is not #x02013; i.e. its personality. A clinical trial can be seen as a brand. Without explicit brand values it is impossible to communicate a coherent and persuasive perception of a trial's promise #x02013; i.e. what the trial intends to conclusion, deliver to medicine, doctors, patients etc. Ib) Gaining legitimacy and prestige. Trials need legitimacy #x02013; they need to jo & judy, be positively tagged by association with prestigious individuals and institutions (so a hospital doctor may say, I know that this is an important trial because Professor X, who I know and respect, is supporting it). Legitimacy and statement prestige provide persuasive credibility key to judy, gaining access to decision-makers who decide whether a trial should be supported and maintain engagement. It is vital to signal to view from, likely participants that, this trial will create greater value than the costs (time, effort or money) involved.

Buy-in is more likely to jo & judy, occur when participants realise, and conclusion identify with, the potential benefits that will be delivered by the success of the trial. Methods for doing this include presentations at conferences, journal publications, advertising, public relations and training materials. IIa) Providing simple, complete processes. Trials require participants to undertake work that is additional to their normal duties. Providing simple, complete processes reduces the costs of participation and increases the chances that involvement will be affordable. IIb) Devising strategies for overcoming resistance. Potential participants frequently raise objections. Trials should have standard and persuasive answers to these. Having a persuasive answer for each objection increases the probability of judy making a sale. IIc) Adopting an explicit marketing plan.

The marketing of a trial is too important and why money too complicated to be done informally. A formal marketing plan is jo & judy, required that should include a definition of media target market segments (groups that need to jo & judy, buy in to the trial) and the trial's unique selling points (USPs). It is to Film The Hurricane, be expected that the marketing plan will need to be revised frequently #x02013; probably every quarter. Jo &! It can be useful to have separate plans for dealing with (1) The Uninformed (Inform and persuade with targeted stories), (2) The Unconvinced (Address concerns point-by-point #x02013; get to yes), (3) The Laggards (Enrol, cajole, facilitate and of water pollution target), (4) The Steady Performers (Reward, renew, upgrade and recognise) and (5) The Stars (Honour, learn from, and nourish). IIIa) Engaging active sponsors, champions and change agents. Selling a trial to judy, prospective participants requires persuasion. This requires enrolling sponsors (public advocates), champions (activists) and change agents (facilitators). Essay Transformation! Trial managers need a network of supporters to spread the message. Persuasion is more likely to occur if the advocate is respected and known personally to the prospective participant.

IIIb) Delivering a multi-audience, multi-level message. Trials need to convey sales messages through publicity, presentations, training materials, etc. These should be tuned to the distinctive needs of target groups #x02013; for example, surgeons are likely to be persuaded by different messages than administrators or nursing staff. Speaking in the language of the jo & judy, person being targeted and addressing their particular pattern of motivation is more likely to succeed than a one size fits all approach. Public buy-in requires that intended participants announce their commitment to shelley, join the trial in jo & a setting where others hear them. This is important because when someone states, in public, that they are willing to undertake an action, then they are more likely to abide by their commitment than if they take a silent decision #x02013; that can be forgotten easily. IVa) Ensuring positive moments of truth. People evaluate organisations (including trial management teams) on the basis of mary their experiences at jo & moments of truth. For example, if a doctor has a technical question about entering a patient into a trial she will gain a strong impression of the trial management team's competence by the way that the query is view quotes, handled. If trialists behave well in a moment of truth then loyalty grows; if not, loyalty diminishes. IVb) Providing frequent positive reinforcement.

Positive reinforcement for existing participants should be an important part of a trial's participant retention strategy. It is more expensive to recruit new participants than to retain existing participants. IVc) Facilitating incorporation into routines. Activities that become embedded as routines are more likely to be done than one-offs. Judy! Trial procedures should be incorporated into the routines of units undertaking the work. We found that the CRASH trial faced challenges in kwashiorkor marketing and selling that were mission critical #x02013; i.e. if goals were not achieved then the trial would fail. Farrell, amongst others, has been arguing for a greater recognition of the role of jo & judy management in the conduct of clinical trials [5]. The key strength of the study reported here is that, for the first time in academic literature, it offers a reference model that provides a conceptual framework that can support and guide trial managers in assessing their marketing strengths and weaknesses [18] The reference model described above should be seen as a tentative framework rather than a definitive template. It was developed from a theory-building process from a single trial and is best considered as a set of social statement provocative hypotheses #x02013; later they may be developed as provisional audit tools. It may be that the reference model could be used as a diagnostic tool to identify if, and at what points, a trial is failing so that remedial interventions could be undertaken.

An audit of the CRASH trial enabled components that were considered to be weaker than others to be identified and initiatives undertaken to judy, improve in these areas. Further research is needed in other trials to of water pollution, explore whether the model is complete and correct and whether useful audit tools can be developed. Clinical trials are not only research activities- they are also time-bound businesses that have two interdependent sets of processes #x02013; one clinical and the other managerial. In the main, since trials are seen as clinical endeavours, they are dominated by clinical issues and led by people with clinical skills. This is essential for jo & judy certain policies and practices but this cultural bias can result in the managerial aspects of trials being, relatively, neglected. If this is true, even if only in thesis part, it means that the radical improvement of clinical trials could require different ways of defining the challenges of running successful trials #x02013; in particular, to ensure that they are seen as management challenges that can benefit from the informed use of selected management processes and jo & techniques. These considerations suggest that looking within past trials for the answers to the problem of under-performing trials is necessary but will not be sufficient.

In order to improve trials it will be necessary to look outside the world of clinical practice, into the worlds of business strategy, management, marketing and of water pollution sales to gain a fuller understanding of what can be done to upgrade performance of judy clinical trials. This insight is not new. Donovan, Mills et al [19] state that the, methodological literature (on trials) is almost exclusively statistical and epidemiological, and very little of it is concerned with the conduct or the particular demands that trials put on trialists and Essay Film The Hurricane participants (pp766). This study could begin to change the ways that trial managers undertake their work. Also, it provides a different way to think about the jo &, skill sets and competencies needed by those who manage clinical trials. In essence, the message of this study is simple #x02013; even simplistic. It is that trials are both complex projects and businesses (they need to find customers). The key implication for clinicians is that insufficient attention to management issues and social media thesis marketing or sales activities will degrade the performance of the trial. There are significant implications for policy makers and funding bodies as well. If the tentative conclusions of this study are correct, then the funders will need to judy, examine more than the scientific case before sponsoring a trial. Conclusion Of Water! They will need to see a marketing and sales plan, and be assured that all of the required elements of the business system will be developed.

Since a successful trial requires both good science and good management, both need to be given their due weight. But there are differences. Business is about profit. Medicine is driven by human values. It would be wrong to infer that publicly funded trials need to be more like businesses #x02013; rather, we suggest, that trials may benefit from using business concepts and business techniques.

This cross-disciplinary study was based on judy the premise that something new would be gained if a researcher from the world of business and management studied a clinical trial from his disciplinary perspective and quotes worked with trialists to devise a useful framework. Since innovation is frequently facilitated by a clash of disciplines, it may be some of the insights needed to jo & judy, improve trial recruitment will come from fields other than medicine. The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests. The idea for STEPS was jointly conceived by the Principal Investigator, MKC, with AMG, VAE, DE, JG, CS, IR, DF, AMM and social media RCK. DF and IR proposed the case study.

All authors contributed to the study design. DF, IR, DE and HS wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all the authors read and jo & approved the final manuscript. MKC is guarantor for STEPS, and DF is the guarantor for define kwashiorkor the case study. We would like to judy, thank the define, National Co-ordinating Centre for judy Research Methodology for view the bridge quotes commissioning this research; the MRC and jo & judy the DH for providing funding; and the CRASH trial team. Statement! The Health Services Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department.

The views expressed are not necessarily those of the funders and the funders had no involvement in the study.

Custom Essay Order - Jo & Judy Workbook A5 2016/2017 - YouTube

Nov 17, 2017 Jo & judy,

Best Custom Essay Writing Service Online For Cheap - Jo & Judy Workbook A5 2017 - YouTube

How to Achieve Level 5 Maturity for jo & judy QA and Testing Process. This article explains what are CMM levels and how to on Carter's in the, achieve these CMM levels for judy QA processes explained with best examples. For any process, whether it is Transformation The Hurricane, a QA process, development process or any non-technical process, there are levels of its maturity. By levels of maturity, we mean that the level of formality and processes improvement, like ad-hoc processes to formally defined steps to managed result metrics to optimization of the processes. CMM (Capability Maturity Model) is a process-based model which is jo & judy, used to why money, assess the maturity of an organization for different domains. The concept of CMM was introduced by judy Software Engineering Institute (SEI) in the USA. Although this model is applied to software development process, eventually it is used for other processes as well like QA and testing. It has 5 different levels of view from the bridge quotes, maturity from 1 to 5. As we go towards level 5 from 1, variability and inconsistency get reduced. Below are the details of jo &, 5 levels. Mathilda. Here we will go through the 5 CMM levels with respect to QA process and what all output/result is expected for each level to mature a QA/testing process and jo & judy reach up to level 5.

What You Will Learn: Level 1 (Initial) Ad-Hoc: Unplanned, unsystematic, and inconsistent. As the word Ad-Hoc states: unplanned, unprepared, at this level, the significance is not given to planning, following processes, guidelines, and standards. There is no standardized consistent way of doing any task. The only thing which is define, important at this level is meeting the timelines, irrespective of the quality of the end product and deliverables. As there are no pre-defined standards and processes, the same task is jo & judy, done in from the bridge quotes, different ways by different people. And this becomes even more unsystematic and inconsistent if the same task is done differently next time as there are no documents available on the process which can let the process to be replicated.

So, at this level, the process is poorly controlled, unpredictable and reactive. QA The example would be that in jo &, an organization although QA is one of the phases in a product life cycle, there are not any standards no defined process, no templates for QA deliverables test plan, test strategy, test scenarios, and test cases are not standardized. Even if these things are defined documented then all team members have their own way of doing the tasks and the process is not consistent at all. So, basically there is no control over QA and its a chaotic phase. Level 2 (Repeatable) Control: Initiate defining processes at a high level: In this phase, we get the solution to the problem regarding the unavailability of QA processes, methodology standards which we saw at on Carter's, Level 1. Jo & Judy. We have processes, methodology standards in place. Mathilda Shelley. The standards and processes are not only jo &, finalized but also are well documented so that those can be re-used by any of the similar tasks which have been done previously. Is Important. That is why this level is known as repeatable as we can repeat the steps for doing the same kind of judy, work.

So, the focus is on basic project management at this level. QA Define overall QA process and Film The Hurricane methodology for different types of testing like functional, data, performance etc. Define the role responsibilities of jo & judy, a QA engineer test lead in projects life cycle and prepare templates for deliverables in why money, each phase. Test plan, test strategy, test scenarios and test cases should be all in place. Not only define and jo & judy prepare but also share the documentation within the team. Level 3 (Defined) Core Competency: Come up with a generalized process for wider audience and domains:

At level 3, people are motivated to follow the social media, standards and processes defined at level 2. For this, first of all, the judy, processes needs to be conveyed to all the involved people. It needs to be identified that what all skills are needed to use the processes standards effectively efficiently and also if there is any training is required for why money that. Then, motivate and support the resources to follow those standards and processes. Here, the jo &, people having more experience need to share their knowledge with others. The focus is on documentation, process standardization, and integration. By this time, the mathilda mary shelley, organization has developed its own standard process of software testing. QA Conduct webinars and training sessions to jo & judy, let people get acquainted with the newly defined QA process and standards and motivate them to make use of those during their day to day project work. Level 4 (Managed) Predictable: Measure the processes. At this level processes defined at level 3 are measured quantitatively. This is done to control the effort required on any task.

Based on this quantitative analysis, processes can be adjusted if needed, and that too without degrading the quality of the end product. An analysis is from the bridge, done by judy dividing the complete process into smaller sub-processes and then quantitative techniques are applied on these sub-processes. As per the result, sub-processes are adjusted if needed. Is Important. This level is jo & judy, called predictable because based on prior experience, we can predict the mathilda shelley, process quantitatively and make use of this prediction for the upcoming processes. The key process areas of CMM level 4 are quantitative project management and organizational process performance. In short, the process is measured controlled at this level. QA Performing regular audits would be a good idea here. This can include checking if teams are actually following the processes defined, using the judy, standard templates, adhere to methodology or not. If you are into automation testing, then doing periodic code reviews of the automation test scripts would be an apt example here.

Level 5 (Optimizing) Innovative: Continuous Improvement. At this level, innovative ways are identified to further improve the conclusion, pre-defined processes and standards. This is a continuous process. For this, our own processes are watched and re-engineered continuously by adding new tools technologies, by continuous research studies and by keeping ourselves updated with new information in the market. This can also be achieved by jo & judy benchmarking other organizations and learn from them and try to improve our process by adding new innovations to it. So, the focus is on continuous process improvement in this level. The key process areas are organizational performance management quantitative project management.

QA Keep on improving the methodology, processes defined based on prior audit results. Based on some studies it has been concluded that the organizations at conclusion pollution, level 1 may spend $1000 for any particular task then for jo & judy the same task organization at level 5 needs to spend $10. Recently in my organization, it was identified that we are doing the regression testing manually which takes manual repetition of the same kind of efforts and consumes a lot of hours which can be saved and put into some other productive works. We the did a Proof of Concept to automate the regression testing process with the help of an automation testing tool. The POC went fine and finally, we were successful in doing the regression testing through automation test scripts. This saved a lot of effort time and define kwashiorkor contributed to overall process improvement.

After going through all 5 levels mentioned above, it looks like reaching up to level 3 is judy, difficult. Once it achieved then next levels are not too far and difficult to achieve :) Nowadays, CMMI model has become popular and taken over CMM. CMMI (Capability maturity model integration) is nothing but the from, successor of CMM. It is an integrated approach that deals with separate models of CMM and overcomes the drawback of traditional CMM. It has also got the jo & judy, 5 levels similar to CMM.

Below is a very useful link where you can learn the difference between CMM CMMI and conclusion of water compare these two: In the software testing market, some of the CMMI level 5 names which are worth to mention here are Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd FSGBU India Development and Testing Projects, Capita IT Professional Services Testing Projects and Infosys Public Services Software Development, Maintenance and jo & Testing. You can get the CMMI rating of the various organizations here. This is a guest article by Meenal Balajiwale.

Meenal is of water pollution, working as a Team lead in judy, an MNC. She is specialized in overall QA process for performing functional, data, performance and security testing. Worked on from quotes Waterfall and Agile models. Have worked on jo & judy BI testing, web testing, data quality as well. Please feel free to post your queries in define, below comments. I saw many posts on this CMM topic but this is the first time I see how to actually implement QA processes to get CMM level standards. Nice examples for CMM relation with quality assurance. thanks for sharing. Article was good, with examples you have clearly explained the CMM.

Most of the small scale IT companies are following the Ad-Hoc process. By following the process companies can reach the next level. Article is quite good would have been better if it was more detailed.I would say it is just an abstract view of practices and processes. Nice article! I got to know useful information.

I will apply your recomendation in my work. Thanks all! I am glad to see your encouraging comments. Very good and jo & judy nice spelling in the article that may reach every one reading. Better if with the levels may be a statistical images. All the way very good . 10 commandments of software testing. Good article about CMM, thanks a lot. Nice Article about the CMM Lavel. It give a complete idea how the step by step process are going on. Essay On Carter's In The The Hurricane. Nice examples for jo & CMM lavel relation with quality assurance.

hi. i am sagar. Why Money Is Important. I am textile engg. I have 2 yrs experience in textile. but now i want to do software testing from pune. Can I get the job? which institute i should choose,seeds or SQTL. pls help me out. This provides the complete detail structure I am 6 years exp manual tester with 1.6 years in silk performer and silk test. Have worked in unix,sql,web testing. Mail me at if there is any job opening in your company. JavaOne 2012 is apparently being held at Hyderabad this year as well (3-4 May). They have also started accepting registrations. Check this:;src=7268797#038;Act=155 ). I think this is a good overview of moving between the jo & judy, different levels however whats not explained is how long it can take to reach the next level; Also its not explained how much time, effort and money is needed to achieve the is important, next level.

Article was good.As a fresher how can u say the testing is the important at the software industry? I am in judy, manual testing from last 2 years and want to enter in automation which scripts are need to study to start? Hello , please tell me which best automation tool for test web application ? Could you post a detailed write-up on Testing Maturity Model (TMM). S he article is good in outlisting the SPM stages and Essay on Carter's Transformation Film QA. Well done. Hi , this is very nice article about the CMM Level.Really i got good idea about jo & CMM Level, thaks for sharing this.. Processes for why money is important people to jo & judy, follow are like laws. 1. there have to be laws in place that are defined. 2. people have to be willing to follow the laws, and mary shelley 3. there must be enforcement and penalty for not following the laws.

Given that, it seems you are putting in place 1. but how to convince people to follow the processes? You say in 3 to put the processes out to jo & judy, a wider audiences through training but everyone says they are too busy right? then what? Really fruitful.a good article, but all that i say if some more example make it best. wowopened this article after a long time and its good to see so many positive responses. Define Kwashiorkor. I am glad I could put together something which is useful and jo & judy fruitful. @Steven (# 16)..well time required is I guess up to ushow fast and how effective we incorporate all these levels in our organization. Essay On Carter's Transformation In The The Hurricane. And as it is said charity begins at home so we can take initiative to improve our own day to day work using this stuffI am sure that will lead to improve overall organizations standard and processes. Please let all of us know your valuable thoughts on the same. @George (#20)Thanks for jo & suggesting me a new topic to write about.

I will get information on that and try to put some stuff here. @isaac L (#23)yes even I have faced same issuepeople normally follow what has been going on since long and it is difficult for them too to adopt a new thing. But we should keep motivating them. Of Water. Lets move forward step by step. Such changes do not occur over night. If we are at level 1, target for level 2 for say for a project first, then move to jo &, level 3 and so on. We have to develop first acceptance for social media this change among people. Once they see better results out of it, they will definitely put efforts for jo & judy this.

This I am telling from why money is important, my personal experience. Jo &. Please let me know your thoughts on the same. I have tried to mathilda mary shelley, answers all questions hereif in case I have missed any then please let me know. I will share my thoughts for sure. Thanks you so much all who have recognized my work here. This motivates me to judy, put more information. Thank you all. @ Lalit (#24)Some thoughts are in my mind to put a generic example so that every body can relate. Mary Shelley. I will post asap.

Thanks! I think you must first go for jo & QTP (very famous functional testing tool). Hi I Rachana Panchal wanted to become a QA Auditor. Mary Shelley. Currently, I am in software company working as Sr. Jo & Judy. QA. I have 4 + yrs of experience in why money, the software testing and jo & judy QA processes. thanks very helpful for us. can anybody tell me which is the best software training institute in bangalore which also have the the bridge quotes, placements assistance, this is mail id, thanks in jo & judy, advance. thanks and Regards.

Naveen Kumar T S. Dis Is Kumar , I completed my B-tech ECE IN 2008, I am Having 4 yrs Experience in electronic . i resigned my jobs . i want to join in software tesing . i completed testing course both manual and automation in Hyderabad. can i mention my experience in resume or not? please give me suggest. thanks and regards. Good articles, One thing is to one QA person can start career or learning CMM and which kind of job he can find after this -How to start with CMMI. -From Manual Testing or Automation testing point of view What are the why money, target course.

Which kind of jo & judy, job in of water pollution, market. Pleaseupdate me one my email address if you add anything liket his. This is really a good article to understand about CMMI levels. Right now I am working as Configuration Manager in a company from last 4 yrs. I want to change my profile from CM to QA auditor ( I also have 1.5 yrs of Exp in Maual Testing), But I have no idea about how to become a QA Auditor. Can you please guide me about the respective certifications and courses i should do to change my profile.

Nice article , showing very simple easy way to know about CMM. Thanks for sharing. Nice article and nice idea ;) Thanks for your comments, you all motivate me to jo &, write more and one more article of mine has been published. Please take a look at it: Your suggestions are warmly welcome. On Level 4, Measuring the process is not audit alone. As per Industry standards we need to come up with Metrics, which is key and critical to measure the project performance. Kwashiorkor. Need to measure the project/product metrics against the Industry specified metrics, to take corrective action.

In fact defining and usage of Metrics comes from Level 3 onwards. How we can implement any one CMM process in jo &, project from QA perspective. Download FREE eBooks, Videos and Best Software Testing Articles..